Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530307›Full record

ReviewAdvances in parasitology2018

Parasites of the Giant Panda: A Risk Factor in the Conservation of a Species.

Tao Wang, Yue Xie, Youle Zheng, Chengdong Wang, Desheng Li, Anson V Koehler, Robin B Gasser

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in parasitology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A snapshot of climate drivers and temporal variation ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A rare case of giant panda cancer: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Surveillance Study ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tao WangFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: tao.wang1@unimelb.edu.au.
Yue XieCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Diet, Genomics and Immunology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Youle ZhengCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chengdong WangChina Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Desheng LiChina Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Anson V KoehlerFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Robin B GasserFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding · CNBeltsville Human Nutrition Research Center · USSichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The giant panda, with an estimated population size of 2239 in the world (in 2015), is a global symbol of wildlife conservation that is threatened by habitat loss, poor reproduction and limited resistance to some infectious diseases. Of these factors, some diseases caused by parasites are considered as the foremost threat to its conservation. However, there is surprisingly little published information on the parasites of the giant panda, most of which has been disseminated in the Chinese literature. Herein, we review all peer-reviewed publications (in English or Chinese language) and governmental documents for information on parasites of the giant pandas, with an emphasis on the intestinal nematode Baylisascaris schroederi (McIntosh, 1939) as it dominates published literature. The purpose of this chapter is to: (i) review the parasites recorded in the giant panda and describe what is known about their biology; (ii) discuss key aspects of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and control of key parasites that are reported to cause clinical problems and (iii) conclude by making some suggestions for future research. This chapter shows that we are only just 'scratching the surface' when it comes to parasites and parasitological research of the giant panda. Clearly, there needs to be a concerted research effort to support the conservation of this iconic species.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesParasitesParasitic Diseases, AnimalAnimalsRisk FactorsUrsidaeAcarinaAiluropoda melanoleucaBaylisascaris schroederiConservationGiant pandaParasites

Identifiers

PMID29530307
PMCPMC7103118
OpenAlexW2789627713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.