Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530092›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Adaptation and assessments of the Chinese version of the ICECAP-A measurement.

Chengxiang Tang, Yao Xiong, Hongyan Wu, Judy Xu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Scoring System for the Japanese Version of the ICECAP-A.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Validation and comparison of five preference-based measures among age-related macular degeneration patients: evidence from mainland China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  11. Measuring health-related quality of life and well-being: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the EQ-5D-5L, ReQoL-UI and ICECAP-A.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  12. The ICECAP-A instrument for capabilities: assessment of construct validity and test-retest reliability in a general Dutch population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Capability of well-being: validation of the Hungarian version of the ICECAP-A and ICECAP-O questionnaires and population normative data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengxiang TangSchool of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Yao XiongSchool of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555# LiuTai Rd, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072, China.
Hongyan WuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Judy XuSchool of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555# LiuTai Rd, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072, China. 962158809@qq.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71463007National Social Science Foundation of China 16BGL097the National Natural Science Foundation of China 71473202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study adapts the ICECAP measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) to assess its capacity to measure the quality of life in China for economic evaluation.

methodsQualitative and quantitative methods were used to translate the ICECAP-A measure for wellbeing, established by the University of Birmingham, UK, to the Chinese cultural context. A focus group discussion solved the appropriateness and wording of the ICECAP attributes in Chinese; and a randomly selected sample of 1000 adults aged over 18 years were online surveyed. We conducted psychometric tests and compared the factors influencing the ICECAP-A measure with those influencing EQ-5D-3 L.

resultsMembers of the focus group discussion agreed that the five attributes of the ICECAP-A measure are sufficient to evaluate wellbeing in China. However, the terms "being settled" and "friendship" were changed to "stability" and "kindness" for the Chinese cultural context. Our results show that the Chinese version of ICECAP-A has good internal consistency with an overall Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.7999. The concurrent validity indicates that ICECAP-A is moderately correlated with EQ-5D-3 L (r ≤ 0.52).

conclusionsThe ICECAP-A measure can be adapted to evaluate wellbeing in China, but cultural changes to the wording are necessary. It is a valid measurement of wellbeing and can complement the EQ-5D already used in China. However, further work is still needed to evaluate the sensitivity of the ICECAP-A measure in relation to public health and social care.

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsQuality of LifeAdultAgedChinaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingTranslationsAssessmentCapabilityChinaICECAP-AValidation

Identifiers

PMID29530092
PMCPMC5848585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.