Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530075›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2018

Prospective associations between pulse pressure and cognitive performance in Chinese middle-aged and older population across a 5-year study period.

Tingting Sha, Wenwei Cheng, Yan Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Association Between Cardiometabolic Risk and Cognitive Function Among Older Americans and Chinese.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tingting ShaDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Xiangya Road 110, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Wenwei ChengDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Xiangya Road 110, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Yan YanDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Xiangya Road 110, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China. yanyan604604@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5549-7988
Central South University · CN

Funding

China Health and Retirement Longitudinal StudyR01AG037031 · NIA · PEKING UNIVERSITY · PI STRAUSS, JOHN A, WANG, YAFENG · 2010 to 2024
$15.1M
China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study - PilotR21AG031372 · NIA · PEKING UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, YAOHUI · 2007 to 2008
$273k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037031NIA NIH HHS R21 AG031372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstantial evidence indicates that the relationship between blood pressure (BP) measures and cognitive functioning is inconsistent, complex, and age-related. Pulse pressure (PP), which can not only reflect arterial stiffness and but also represent the chronic effects of hypertension other than BP itself, has been considered as a better predictor of cognitive impairment. However, evidence on the association of cognitive function with PP has not been investigated extensively. We examined this relationship in a longitudinal study based on the latent growth model (LGM).

methodsThis study was based on a nationally representative sample of Chinese middle-aged and older participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a prospective observational study conducted from 2011 to 2016. Cognitive performance was assessed on the basis of three measures of cognition. The PP was calculated as the difference of the average values of three systolic and diastolic BP readings. A series of potential confounders were collected in this research. The LGM was used to examine the effects of PP on cognitive performance at three time points. To test the independent effects of PP on the initial level and the subsequent development of cognition, unconditional and conditional models were compared sequentially.

resultsAfter excluding respondents with missing key variables, we ultimately included 9750 participants in the analysis. Cognitive performance scores and PP showed significant differences across time. After adjustment for the confounders, the standardized coefficients of PP in the LGM indicated negative effects on cognitive performance in elderly Chinese participants at wave 2 and wave 3 (P < 0.01). The initial level of PP in the unconditional model was negatively associated with the initial level (β = - 0.25) and the slope (β = - 0.16) of cognition, whereas these effects were attenuated and the association between intercept of PP and slope of cognition became nonsignificant after controlling for the confounders.

conclusionsThe implications of these results demonstrate that a higher PP lowers the cognitive performance of middle-aged and elderly persons independent of a comprehensive set of covariates, but it is not a contributor to the rate of change in cognition.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingAsian PeopleBlood PressureCognitionCohort StudiesCommunity Health PlanningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNeuropsychological TestsStatistics, NonparametricAgingArterial stiffnessCognitionLatent growth modelPulse pressure

Identifiers

PMID29530075
PMCPMC5848624
OpenAlexW2800428165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.