Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530024›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Chinese translation and psychometric testing of the cardiac self-efficacy scale in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland China.

Xuelin Zhang, Yan Zhan, Jun Liu, Shouxia Chai, Lanlan Xu, Meirong Lei, Karen Wei Ling Koh, Ying Jiang, Wenru Wang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuelin ZhangSchool of Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Yan ZhanDepartment of Cardiovascular, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Dongfeng Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Shouxia ChaiSchool of Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Lanlan XuSchool of Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Meirong LeiSchool of Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Karen Wei Ling KohNational University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ying JiangAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Block MD 11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, Singapore.
Wenru WangAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Block MD 11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, Singapore. nurww@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-8215

Funding

Hubei Provincial Education Department of Pilot Reformation 201628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA person's self-efficacy plays a critical role during the chronic management process of a health condition. Assessment of self-efficacy for patients with heart diseases is essential for healthcare professionals to provide tailored interventions to help patient to manage the disease.

objectiveTo translate and test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Cardiac Self-efficacy Scale (C-CSES) as a disease-specific instrument for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in mainland China.

methodsThe original English version of the CSES was translated into Chinese using a forward-backward translation approach. A convenience sample consisting of 224 Chinese patients with CHD were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital in Shiyan, China. The C-CSES and the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) were used in this study. The factor structure, convergent and discriminative validities, and internal consistency of the C-CSES were evaluated.

resultsThe confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a three-factor high-order structure of the C-CSES with model fit indexes (RMSEA = 0.084, CFI = 0.954, NNFI = 0.927, IFI = 0.954 and χ

conclusionThe empirical data supported that the C-CSES is a valid and reliable disease-specific instrument for assessing the self-efficacy of Chinese patients with CHD.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSelf EfficacyAgedChinaCoronary DiseaseFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsCardiac self-efficacyChineseCoronary heart diseaseCross-culturalPsychometric testingValidation

Identifiers

PMID29530024
PMCPMC5848528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.