ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2018
A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution.
Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 338 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stigma in substance-based and behavioural addictions: A systematic review.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025Pooled it
- Prevention and Health Promotion Interventions for Young People in the Context of Digital Well-Being: Rapid Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Problematic Gaming and Gambling: A Systematic Review of Task-Specific EEG Protocols.Journal of gambling studies · 2024Pooled it
- Problematic Gaming and Sleep: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Face validity evaluation of screening tools for gaming disorder: Scope, language, and overpathologizing issues.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Estimated prevalence of gaming disorder based on ICD-11 and DSM-5 frameworks in a large and representative sample of young Swiss men.Addictive behaviors reports · 2026Article
- Open science practices in behavioral addictions: An exploratory survey.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2026Article
- Parent-child discrepancies in screening for Internet Gaming Disorder: Evidence from a clinical sample of Japanese adolescents.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Language of change in online narratives of recovery from disordered gaming.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Overestimates of social media addiction are common but costly.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gaming disorder in the ICD-11: the state of the game.BMC psychiatry · 2025Review
- Salience and tolerance are not indicators of problematic social media use: Evidence from the Social Media Disorder Scale and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025Article
- Mindfulness meditation reduces symptoms and modulates neural circuitry in comorbid internet gaming disorder and depression.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Social context in the development of problematic gaming habits: a narrative exploration.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- Global psychiatrists' opinions aboutPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Correlates of (Internet) Gaming Disorder among Young Adults in Singapore.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
- The temporal stability of problematic gaming and gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Addictive behaviors reports · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Gaming Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Psychiatry investigation · 2025Article
- Behavioral and psychological correlates of problematic smartphone use in street ketamine users.BMC psychology · 2025Article
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
37 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We greatly appreciate the care and thought that is evident in the 10 commentaries that discuss our debate paper, the majority of which argued in favor of a formalized ICD-11 gaming disorder. We agree that there are some people whose play of video games is related to life problems. We believe that understanding this population and the nature and severity of the problems they experience should be a focus area for future research. However, moving from research construct to formal disorder requires a much stronger evidence base than we currently have. The burden of evidence and the clinical utility should be extremely high, because there is a genuine risk of abuse of diagnoses. We provide suggestions about the level of evidence that might be required: transparent and preregistered studies, a better demarcation of the subject area that includes a rationale for focusing on gaming particularly versus a more general behavioral addictions concept, the exploration of non-addiction approaches, and the unbiased exploration of clinical approaches that treat potentially underlying issues, such as depressive mood or social anxiety first. We acknowledge there could be benefits to formalizing gaming disorder, many of which were highlighted by colleagues in their commentaries, but we think they do not yet outweigh the wider societal and public health risks involved. Given the gravity of diagnostic classification and its wider societal impact, we urge our colleagues at the WHO to err on the side of caution for now and postpone the formalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.