Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29529852›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of parasitology2018

Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit to Detect IgG/IgM Antibody against Zika Virus Using Monoclonal Antibodies to the Envelope and Non-structural Protein 1 of the Virus.

Yeong Hoon Kim, Jihoo Lee, Young-Eun Kim, Chom-Kyu Chong, Yanaihara Pinchemel, Francis Reisdörfer, Joyce Brito Coelho, Ronaldo Ferreira Dias, Pan Kee Bae, Zuinara Pereira Maia Gusmão and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of parasitology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Zika virus serological diagnosis: commercial tests and monoclonal antibodies as tools.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  9. Zika virus: A possible emerging threat for Bangladesh!Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yeong Hoon KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Jihoo LeeGenBody Inc., Cheonan 31116, Korea.
Young-Eun KimGenBody Inc., Cheonan 31116, Korea.
Chom-Kyu ChongGenBody Inc., Cheonan 31116, Korea.
Yanaihara PinchemelBahiafarma, Simoes Filho, Bahia, Brazil.
Francis ReisdörferBahiafarma, Simoes Filho, Bahia, Brazil.
Joyce Brito CoelhoBahiafarma, Simoes Filho, Bahia, Brazil.
Ronaldo Ferreira DiasBahiafarma, Simoes Filho, Bahia, Brazil.
Pan Kee BaeBioNano Health Guard Research Center, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Zuinara Pereira Maia GusmãoLacen-ba, Laboratorio Central, Bahia, Brazil.
Hye-Jin AhnDepartment of Parasitology, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Ho-Woo NamDepartment of Parasitology, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Catholic University of Korea · KRGenbody (South Korea) · KRCentro Universitário Moura Lacerda · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) kit for detecting IgG/IgM antibodies against Zika virus (ZIKV) using monoclonal antibodies to the envelope (E) and non-structural protein 1 (NS1) of ZIKV. These proteins were produced using baculovirus expression vector with Sf9 cells. Monoclonal antibodies J2G7 to NS1 and J5E1 to E protein were selected and conjugated with colloidal gold to produce the Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit (Zika RDT). Comparisons with ELISA, plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), and PCR were done to investigate the analytical sensitivity of Zika RDT, which resulted in 100% identical results. Sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT in a field test was determined using positive and negative samples from Brazil and Korea. The diagnostic accuracy of Zika RDT was fairly high; sensitivity and specificity for IgG was 99.0 and 99.3%, respectively, while for IgM it was 96.7 and 98.7%, respectively. Cross reaction with dengue virus was evaluated using anti-Dengue Mixed Titer Performance Panel (PVD201), in which the Zika RDT showed cross-reactions with DENV in 16.7% and 5.6% in IgG and IgM, respectively. Cross reactions were not observed with West Nile, yellow fever, and hepatitis C virus infected sera. Zika RDT kit is very simple to use, rapid to assay, and very sensitive, and highly specific. Therefore, it would serve as a choice of method for point-of-care diagnosis and large scale surveys of ZIKV infection under clinical or field conditions worldwide in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalReagent Kits, DiagnosticAntibodies, ViralCross ReactionsDengue VirusHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSensitivity and SpecificityViral Envelope ProteinsViral Nonstructural ProteinsZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MReagent Kits, DiagnosticViral Envelope ProteinsViral Nonstructural Proteinscross reactiondiagnosticsenvelopeflavivirusmonoclonal antibodyNS1RDTZika

Identifiers

PMID29529852
PMCPMC5858665
OpenAlexW2792368534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.