Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29529618›Full record

Trial reportClinical orthopaedics and related research2018

The John N. Insall Award: Higher Tissue Concentrations of Vancomycin Achieved With Intraosseous Regional Prophylaxis in Revision TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Simon W Young, Mei Zhang, Grant A Moore, Rocco P Pitto, Henry D Clarke, Mark J Spangehl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713528 (Can Intraosseous Antibiotics Improve the Results of Irrigation & Debridement and Prosthetic Retention for PJI?), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03713528 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Can Intraosseous Antibiotics Improve the Results of Irrigation & Debridement and Prosthetic Retention for PJI?

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.Ran2020 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsJoint InfectionArmsIntraoperative Intraosseous Vancomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon W YoungS. W. Young, R. P. Pitto Department of Orthopaedics, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; and the Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand M. Zhang Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand G. A. Moore Toxicology, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand H. D. Clarke, M. J. Spangehl Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mei Zhang
Grant A Moore
Rocco P Pitto
Henry D Clarke
Mark J Spangehl
North Shore Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn primary TKA, prophylaxis with low-dose vancomycin through intraosseous regional administration (IORA) achieves tissue concentrations six to 10 times higher than systemic administration and was shown to provide more effective prophylaxis in an animal model. However, in revision TKA, the presence of a tibial implant may compromise IORA injection, and tourniquet deflation during a prolonged procedure may lower tissue concentrations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does low-dose IORA reliably provide equal or higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin compared with systemic IV administration in revision TKA? (2) Are tissue concentrations of vancomycin after IORA maintained for the duration of the revision TKA despite a period of tourniquet deflation? (3) Is there any difference in early postoperative (< 6 weeks) complications between IORA and systemic IV administration in revision TKA?

methodsTwenty patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA were randomized to two groups. The IV group received 1 g systemic IV prophylactic vancomycin. The IORA group received 500 mg vancomycin as a bolus injection into a tibial intraosseous cannula below an inflated thigh tourniquet before skin incision. In all patients receiving IORA, intraosseous tibial injection was technically possible despite the presence of a tibial implant. Mean procedure length was 3.5 hours in both groups. Mean initial tourniquet inflation was 1.5 hours with a second inflation for a mean of 35 minutes during cementation. During the procedure, subcutaneous fat and bone samples were taken at regular intervals. Tissue vancomycin concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.

resultsOverall geometric mean tissue concentration of vancomycin in fat samples was 3.7 μg/g (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-5.2) in the IV group versus 49.3 μg/g in the IORA group (95% CI, 33.2-73.4; ratio between means 13.5; 95% CI, 8.2-22.0; p < 0.001); mean tissue concentrations in femoral bone were 6.4 μg/g (95% CI, 4.5-9.2) in the IV group versus 77.1 μg/g (95% CI, 42.4-140) in the IORA group (ratio between means 12.0; 95% CI, 6.2-23.2; p < 0.001). Vancomycin concentrations in the final subcutaneous fat sample taken before closure were 5.3 times higher in the IORA group versus the IV group (mean ± SD, 18.2 ± 11.6 μg/g IORA versus 3.6 ± 2.5 μg/g; p < 0.001). The intraarticular concentration of vancomycin on postoperative Day 1 drain samples was not different between the two groups with the numbers available (mean 4.6 μg/L in the IV group versus 6.6 μg/g in the IORA group; mean difference 2.0 μg/g; 95% CI, 6.2-23.2; p = 0.08).

conclusionsIORA administration of vancomycin in patients undergoing revision TKA resulted in tissue concentrations of vancomycin five to 20 times higher than systemic IV administration despite the lower dose. High tissue concentrations were maintained throughout the procedure despite a period of tourniquet deflation. These preliminary results justify prospective cohort studies, which might focus on broader safety endpoints in more diverse patient populations. We believe that these studies should evaluate patients undergoing revision TKA in particular, because the risk of infection is greater than in patients undergoing primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAwards and PrizesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID29529618
PMCPMC5919223
OpenAlexW2802408127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.