Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29529409›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2018

Machine Learning of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Network Connectivity Predicts Substance Abuse Treatment Completion.

Vaughn R Steele, J Michael Maurer, Mohammad R Arbabshirani, Eric D Claus, Brandi C Fink, Vikram Rao, Vince D Calhoun, Kent A Kiehl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of New Diagnostic Techniques: Machine Learning.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Addiction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Masked features of task states found in individual brain networks.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine Learning With Neuroimaging: Evaluating Its Applications in Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vaughn R SteeleIntramural Research Program, Neuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: vaughn.r.steele@gmail.com.
J Michael MaurerMind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mohammad R ArbabshiraniMind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Eric D ClausMind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Brandi C FinkDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Vikram RaoMind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Vince D CalhounMind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Kent A KiehlMind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of New Mexico · USGeisinger Health System · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CHEN, YU-HAN · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000041 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LARSON, RICHARD S · 2012 to 2014
$9.8M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
COINSTAC: Decentralized, Scalable Analysis of Loosely Coupled DataR01DA040487 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, PLIS, SERGEY · 2015 to 2024
$7.1M
Brain changes and outcomes accompanying evidence-based treatment in high-risk youthR01HD082257 · NICHD · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALDWELL, MICHAEL F., KIEHL, KENT A · 2015 to 2020
$3.5M
Neurocognitive Changes Associated with Behavioral Treatment in Cocaine AbusersR01DA020870 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2005 to 2009
$3.0M
Action Monitoring, Action Observation and Dopamine Genes as Predictors of SubstanR01DA026964 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2TR000089 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LARSON, RICHARD S · 2012 to 2014
$909k
TDCS and Cognitive Retraining to Augment Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Nicotine DependenceR21DA037546 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CLAUS, ERIC D · 2015 to 2016
$500k
Modifying Alcohol Approach Motivations with tDCS and Cognitive RetrainingR21AA021201 · NIAAA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CLAUS, ERIC D · 2013 to 2014
$444k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000089NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000041NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA021608NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020594NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA021201NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA022367NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082257NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020870NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040487NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037546NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessfully treating illicit drug use has become paramount, yet elusive. Devising specialized treatment interventions could increase positive outcomes, but it is necessary to identify risk factors of poor long-term outcomes to develop specialized, efficacious treatments. We investigated whether functional network connectivity (FNC) measures were predictive of substance abuse treatment completion using machine learning pattern classification of functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

methodsTreatment-seeking stimulant- or heroin-dependent incarcerated participants (n = 139; 89 women) volunteered for a 12-week substance abuse treatment program. Participants performed a response inhibition Go/NoGo functional magnetic resonance imaging task prior to onset of the substance abuse treatment. We tested whether FNC related to the anterior cingulate cortex would be predictive of those who would or would not complete a 12-week substance abuse treatment program.

resultsMachine learning pattern classification models using FNC between networks incorporating the anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, and insula predicted which individuals would (sensitivity: 81.31%) or would not (specificity: 78.13%) complete substance abuse treatment. FNC analyses predicted treatment completion above and beyond other clinical assessment measures, including age, sex, IQ, years of substance use, psychopathy, anxiety and depressive symptomatology, and motivation for change.

conclusionsAberrant neural network connections predicted substance abuse treatment outcomes, which could illuminate new targets for developing interventions designed to reduce or eliminate substance use while facilitating long-term outcomes. This work represents the first application of machine-learning models of FNC analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to predict which substance abusers would or would not complete treatment.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsCerebral CortexCorpus StriatumFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysSubstance-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsDrug treatmentError processingfMRIICAMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID29529409
PMCPMC5851466
OpenAlexW2739585548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.