Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29529343›Full record

Trial reportJournal of surgical oncology2018

Intralesional PV-10 for the treatment of in-transit melanoma metastases-Results of a prospective, non-randomized, single center study.

Tavis A Read, Aaron Smith, Janine Thomas, Michael David, Matthew Foote, Michael Wagels, Andrew Barbour, B Mark Smithers

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Immunotherapy for Melanoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tavis A ReadQueensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-3985
Aaron SmithSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Janine ThomasQueensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael DavidSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Matthew FooteQueensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael WagelsQueensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew BarbourQueensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
B Mark SmithersQueensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with in-transit melanoma metastases frequently experience high rates of recurrence, limited overall survival and reduced quality of life. After promising results within a Phase II, multi-center study, PV-10 treatment was continued at our institution for patients with in-transit disease. METHODOLOGY: An open-label, non-randomized, prospective study was performed at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia. Patients were treated with PV-10 in accordance with the treatment protocol established during a previous Phase II study. The primary outcome was the complete response of treated lesions.

resultsForty-five patients were enrolled over a total of 82 treatment episodes from July 2008 to December 2015. With sequential PV-10 treatments the complete response rate was 42% and overall response rate 87% on an intention to treat analysis. The median follow-up duration was 22 months and the median overall survival was 25 months from first PV-10 treatment. Having fewer than 15 metastases at the time of treatment was associated with a complete response (P = 0.03).

conclusionsIntralesional PV-10 provided rapid lesion-specific ablation of melanoma metastases with well-tolerated local effects and minimal systemic adverse events. This therapy should be considered for patients with multiple accessible deposits within the spectrum of low to moderate disease volume.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInjections, IntralesionalMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRose BengalRose Bengalintralesionalin-transitmelanomametastasesPV-10Rose Bengal

Identifiers

PMID29529343
PMCPMC6668008
OpenAlexW2792179496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.