Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29529201›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2018

Is it safe to go back into the water? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of acquiring infections from recreational exposure to seawater.

Anne F C Leonard, Andrew Singer, Obioha C Ukoumunne, William H Gaze, Ruth Garside

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Seaweed exposure modulatesMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Acute gastrointestinal illness burden associated with water recreation in high-income countries: A scoping review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Re-thinking human interactions with the oceans.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recreational water illness in Canada: a changing risk landscape in the context of climate change.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Bathing Water Quality Monitoring Practices in Europe and the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Children Exposure-Related Behavior Patterns and Risk Perception Associated with Recreational Beach Use.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne F C LeonardEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK.
Andrew SingerCentre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Obioha C UkoumunneNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
William H GazeEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK.
Ruth GarsideEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous illnesses are associated with bathing in natural waters, although it is assumed that the risk of illness among bathers exposed to relatively clean waters found in high-income countries is negligible. A systematic review was carried out to quantify the increased risk of experiencing a range of adverse health outcomes among bathers exposed to coastal water compared with non-bathers. Methods: In all 6919 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were screened, and from these 40 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Odds ratios (OR) were extracted from 19 of these reports and combined in random-effect meta-analyses for the following adverse health outcomes: incident cases of any illness, ear infections, gastrointestinal illness and infections caused by specific microorganisms. Results: There is an increased risk of experiencing symptoms of any illness [OR = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.64, P = 0.001] and ear ailments (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.82, P < 0.001) in bathers compared with non-bathers. There is also an increased risk of experiencing gastrointestinal ailments (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.49, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This is the first systematic review to evaluate evidence on the increased risk of acquiring illnesses from bathing in seawater compared with non-bathers. Our results support the notion that infections are acquired from bathing in coastal waters, and that bathers have a greater risk of experiencing a variety of illnesses compared with non-bathers.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyBathing BeachesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecreationSwimmingWaterborne Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29529201
PMCPMC5913622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.