Observational studyThe American journal of clinical nutrition2018
Is folic acid safe for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients? An evidence-based cohort study.
Observational study in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Fruit and vegetable consumption, dietary and plasma carotenoids and risks of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Is folic acid associated with lung cancer development? A cross-sectional study in NHANES.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Metabolomic Biomarkers for Prognosis in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025Review
- Biological, dietetic and pharmacological properties of vitamin BNPJ science of food · 2025Review
- Functional Nanomedicines for Targeted Therapy of Bladder Cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- B Vitamins and Their Role in Immune Regulation and Cancer.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Effects of folic acid withdrawal on transcriptomic profiles in murine triple-negative breast cancer cell lines.Biochimie · 2020Article
- Preventing Lethal Prostate Cancer with Diet, Supplements, and Rx: Heart Healthy Continues to Be Prostate Healthy and "First Do No Harm" Part II.Current urology reports · 2020Review
- Lifestyle and Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence, Progression, and Mortality: Available Research and Future Directions.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Periconceptional intake of folic acid among low-risk women in Canada: summary of a workshop aiming to align prenatal folic acid supplement composition with current expert guidelines.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with cancer are highly concerned about food choices and dietary supplements that may affect their treatment outcomes. Excess folic acid (synthetic folate) from supplements or fortification can lead to accumulation of unmetabolized folic acid in the systemic circulation and urine and may promote cancer growth, especially among those with neoplastic alterations. Objective: We investigated the prospective association between synthetic compared with natural folate intake and clinical outcomes in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which is a highly recurrent disease. Design: In a cohort of 619 NMIBC patients, folate intake at diagnosis was assessed with a previously validated food-frequency questionnaire and categorized according to tertiles. After a median follow-up of 5.2 y, 303 tumor recurrence and 108 progression events were documented from medical record review. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic models were used to estimate adjusted HRs and ORs with 95% CIs. Results: Synthetic folic acid intake was positively associated with a risk of recurrence among NMIBC patients (medium compared with low intake-HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.48; P = 0.003; high compared with low intake-HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.84; P = 0.01). Patients with a higher folic acid intake were more likely to have multifocal tumors at diagnosis (medium or high compared with low-OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.08, 4.02; P = 0.03). In contrast, natural folate intake tended to be inversely associated with the risk of progression (medium or high compared with low-HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.04; P = 0.08). Conclusions: A high intake of synthetic folic acid, in contrast to the natural forms, is associated with an increased risk of recurrence in NMIBC and multifocal tumors at diagnosis, which suggests that folic acid may be unsafe for NMIBC patients. These findings provide some evidence for nutritional consultation with regard to folate intake among NMIBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.