ArticlePloS one2018
Profiling DNA methylation differences between inbred mouse strains on the Illumina Human Infinium MethylationEPIC microarray.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental exposures and epigenetic alterations in common chronic diseases: insights and challenges.Environmental epigenetics · 2026Review
- Maternal Vitamin C Deficiency and Genetic Risk Factors Contribute to Congenital Defects through Dysregulation of DNA Methylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrative ensemble modelling of cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer patient-derived xenografts.Nature communications · 2024Article
- DNA demethylation triggers cell free DNA release in colorectal cancer cells.Genome medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Lack of Methylation Changes inActa medica Philippina · 2023Article
- Speg interactions that regulate the stability of excitation-contraction coupling protein complexes in triads and dyads.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Variation in histone configurations correlates with gene expression across nine inbred strains of mice.Genome research · 2023Article
- Comparative epigenome analysis using Infinium DNA methylation BeadChips.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- DNA methylation dynamics and dysregulation delineated by high-throughput profiling in the mouse.Cell genomics · 2022Article
- Epigenetic Clocks for Mice Based on Age-Associated Regions That are Conserved Between Mouse Strains and Human.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Body weight and high-fat diet are associated with epigenetic aging in female members of the BXD murine family.Aging cell · 2020Article
- DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations.Genome biology · 2019Review
- Methylation at cg05575921 of a smoking-related gene (AHRR) in non-smoking Taiwanese adults residing in areas with different PMClinical epigenetics · 2019Article
- SOX2 promoter hypermethylation in non-smoking Taiwanese adults residing in air pollution areas.Clinical epigenetics · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC provides an efficient platform for profiling DNA methylation in humans at over 850,000 CpGs. Model organisms such as mice do not currently benefit from an equivalent array. Here we used this array to measure DNA methylation in mice. We defined probes targeting conserved regions and performed differential methylation analysis and compared between the array-based assay and affinity-based DNA sequencing of methyl-CpGs (MBD-seq) and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Mouse samples consisted of 11 liver DNA from two strains, C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2), that varied widely in age. Linear regression was applied to detect differential methylation. In total, 13,665 probes (1.6% of total probes) aligned to conserved CpGs. Beta-values (β-value) for these probes showed a distribution similar to that in humans. Overall, there was high concordance in methylation signal between the EPIC array and MBD-seq (Pearson correlation r = 0.70, p-value < 0.0001). However, the EPIC probes had higher quantitative sensitivity at CpGs that are hypo- (β-value < 0.3) or hypermethylated (β-value > 0.7). In terms of differential methylation, no EPIC probe detected a significant difference between age groups at a Benjamini-Hochberg threshold of 10%, and the MBD-seq performed better at detecting age-dependent change in methylation. However, the top most significant probe for age (cg13269407; uncorrected p-value = 1.8 x 10-5) is part of the clock CpGs used to estimate the human epigenetic age. For strain, 219 EPIC probes detected significant differential methylation (FDR cutoff 10%) with ~80% CpGs associated with higher methylation in D2. This higher methylation profile in D2 compared to B6 was also replicated by the MBD-seq data. To summarize, we found only a small subset of EPIC probes that target conserved sites. However, for this small subset the array provides a reliable assay of DNA methylation and can be effectively used to measure differential methylation in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.