Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29528996›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2018

Acceptability and Feasibility of Rapid Chlamydial, Gonococcal, and Trichomonal Screening and Treatment in Pregnant Women in 6 Low- to Middle-Income Countries.

Chelsea Lee Shannon, Claire Bristow, Nicole Hoff, Adriane Wynn, Minh Nguyen, Andrew Medina-Marino, Jeanne Cabeza, Anne Rimoin, Jeffrey D Klausner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PersistentInternational journal of STD & AIDS · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chelsea Lee Shannon
Claire BristowDivision of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Nicole HoffDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Adriane Wynn
Minh NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Andrew Medina-MarinoResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jeanne CabezaSouth American Program in HIV Prevention Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Anne RimoinDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Jeffrey D Klausner

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ANTON, PETER A · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
HOPE Training GrantT32AI007384 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sara Gianella Weibel, Scott L Letendre · 1990 to 2026
$9.7M
Pilot Study of STI Screening and Treatment for PMTCTR21HD084274 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KLAUSNER, JEFFREY DAVID, MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2015 to 2016
$352k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007384NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD084274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) infections during pregnancy are linked with adverse birth outcomes. However, few countries have prenatal CT, NG, or TV screening programs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of CT, NG, and TV screening and treatment among pregnant women across 6 low- to middle-income countries.

methodsA total of 1817 pregnant women were screened for CT, NG, and TV in Botswana, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, South Africa, and Vietnam. An additional 640 pregnant women were screened for CT in Peru. Screening occurred between December 2012 and October 2017. Acceptability of screening was evaluated at each site as the proportion of eligible women who agreed to participate in screening. Feasibility of treatment was calculated as the proportion of women who tested positive that received treatment.

resultsAcceptability of screening and feasibility of treatment was high across all 6 sites. Acceptability of screening ranged from 85% to 99%, and feasibility of treatment ranged from 91% to 100%. DISCUSSION: The high acceptability and feasibility of screening and treatment of CT, NG, and TV among pregnant women supports further research to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prenatal CT, NG, and TV screening programs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChlamydia InfectionsDeveloping CountriesFeasibility StudiesFemaleGonorrheaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePovertyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant People

Identifiers

PMID29528996
PMCPMC6129444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.