Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29528686›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2018

Synthetic Biology Approaches to Engineer Probiotics and Members of the Human Microbiota for Biomedical Applications.

Josef R Bober, Chase L Beisel, Nikhil U Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Metabolic Engineering of ProbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josef R BoberDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA; email: nikhil.nair@tufts.edu.
Chase L BeiselDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA; email: cbeisel@ncsu.edu.
Nikhil U NairDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA; email: nikhil.nair@tufts.edu.

Funding

Metabolic engineering in humans: Altered gut microbes as a therapeutic platformDP2HD091798 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI NAIR, NIKHIL UNNI · 2016 to 2016
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD091798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have strongly correlated the composition of the human microbiota with many human health conditions and, in several cases, have shown that manipulating the microbiota directly affects health. These insights have generated significant interest in engineering indigenous microbiota community members and nonresident probiotic bacteria as biotic diagnostics and therapeutics that can probe and improve human health. In this review, we discuss recent advances in synthetic biology to engineer commensal and probiotic lactic acid bacteria, bifidobacteria, and Bacteroides for these purposes, and we provide our perspective on the future potential of these technologies.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacteroidesCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic EngineeringGenomicsHumansImmune SystemLactic AcidProbioticsSynthetic BiologyLactic AcidCRISPRgenetic toolsgenome engineeringmicrobiomeprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID29528686
PMCPMC6100750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.