Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29528420›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2018

Annual changes in the Fukushima residents' views on the safety of water and air environments and their associations with the perception of radiation risks.

Satoshi Suzuki, Michio Murakami, Tatsuhiro Nishikiori, Shigeki Harada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi SuzukiFukushima Prefectural Centre for Environmental Creation, 2-10 Fukasaku, Miharu-machi, Tamura-gun, Fukushima, 963-7700, Japan.
Michio MurakamiDepartment of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima City, 960-1295, Japan.
Tatsuhiro NishikioriFukushima Prefectural Centre for Environmental Creation, 2-10 Fukasaku, Miharu-machi, Tamura-gun, Fukushima, 963-7700, Japan.
Shigeki HaradaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, School of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Miyagi University, 2-2-1 Hatadate, Taihaku-ku, Miyagi, 982-0215, Japan.
Fukushima Prefectural Culture Center · JPFukushima Medical University · JPMiyagi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fukushima residents' negative views on the safety of water and air environments have been a concern since the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident. The objective of this study was to clarify the factors determining these negative views and their association with radiation risk perception using the opinion poll conducted by Fukushima Prefecture from 2010 to 2015. In a model, in which the objective variables were the views on the safety of water and air environments, and the explanatory variables were the regions constituting Fukushima and the age and sex of the residents, the odds ratio (OR) of the views on the safety of the water and air environments (reference region: the least affected region) was significantly low at 0.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.28] to 0.18 (0.07-0.46) in the Hamadori region including the evacuation order area, from the accident in 2011 to 2015, with the exception of 2014. In another model, in which the region was excluded from the explanatory variables and radiation risk perception, the distance from the FDNPP and the air dose rate were added to the previous model as an explanatory variable, the views on the safety of the water and air environments were strongly associated with low radiation risk perception (low anxiety) in 2012-2015 [OR: 7.73 (5.25-11.4) to 10.3 (6.71-15.8)], distance from FDNPP, and age, but not with air dose rate. This result suggests that the radiation risk perception, distance from FDNPP, and age were factors determining people's views on the safety of the water and air environment.

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentRadiation MonitoringAir Pollutants, RadioactiveGeographyHumansJapanLogistic ModelsRisk FactorsWater Pollutants, RadioactiveAir Pollutants, RadioactiveWater Pollutants, Radioactive

Identifiers

PMID29528420
PMCPMC5941158
OpenAlexW2791897347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.