Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29528244›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery2018

Cell penetrating peptides functionalized gambogic acid-nanostructured lipid carrier for cancer treatment.

Rui Huang, Jiawei Li, Dereje Kebebe, Yumei Wu, Bing Zhang, Zhidong Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Caged Polyprenylated Xanthones inDrug design, development and therapy · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Conventional Nanosized Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Gambogic acid: A shining natural compound to nanomedicine for cancer therapeutics.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rui Huanga Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , P.R. China.
Jiawei Lia Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , P.R. China.
Dereje Kebebea Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , P.R. China.
Yumei Wua Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , P.R. China.
Bing Zhanga Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , P.R. China.
Zhidong Liua Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-targeted delivery is considered a crucial component of current anticancer drug development and is the best approach to increase the efficacy and reduce the toxicity. Nanomedicine, particularly ligand-based nanoparticles have shown a great potential for active targeting of tumor. Cell penetrating peptide is one of the promising ligands in a targeted cancer therapy. In this study, the gambogic acid-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier (GA-NLC) was modified with two kinds of cell penetrating peptides (cRGD and RGERPPR). The GA-NLC was prepared by emulsification and solvent evaporation method and coupled with cRGD, RGERPPR, and combination cRGD and RGERPPR to form GA-NLC-cRGD, GA-NLC-RGE, and GA-NLC-cRGD/RGE, respectively. The formulations were characterized by their particle size and morphology, zeta potential, encapsulation efficiency, and differential scanning calorimetry. In vitro cytotoxicity and cellular uptake study of the formulations were performed against breast cancer cell (MDA-MB-231). Furthermore, in vivo biodistribution and antitumor activity of the formulations were determined by in vivo imaging and in tumor-bearing nude mice, respectively. The result of in vitro cytotoxicity study showed that GA-NLC-RGE exhibited a significantly higher cytotoxicity on MDA-MB-231 as compared with GA-NLC and GA-Sol. Similarly, RGE-Cou-6-NLC showed remarkably higher uptake by the cells than other NLCs over the incubation period. The in vivo imaging study has demonstrated that among the formulations, the RGE-decorated DiR-NLC were more accumulated in the tumor site. The in vivo antitumor activity revealed that RGE-GA-NLC inhibits the tumor growth more efficiently than other formulations. In conclusion, RGERPPR has a potential as an effective carrier in targeting drug delivery of anticancer agents.

Indexed as

Absorption, PhysiologicalAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell-Penetrating PeptidesCell SurvivalDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingFemaleHumansMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanostructuresParticle SizeAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell-Penetrating PeptidesDrug Carriersgambogic acidRGERPPR peptideXanthonesCancercell penetrating peptidegambogic acidnanostructured lipid carriertumor targeting

Identifiers

PMID29528244
PMCPMC6058566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.