Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29528161›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Heritability of aggression following social evaluation in middle childhood: An fMRI study.

Michelle Achterberg, Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde, Mara van der Meulen, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Eveline A Crone

Open access · hybridAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. In the moment, out of reach? Experience sampling with adolescents in the context of school smartphone bans and shifting societal norms.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Associations between social behaviors and experiences with neural correlates of implicit emotion regulation in middle childhood.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle AchterbergLeiden Consortium on Individual Development, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-6495
Anna C K van DuijvenvoordeLeiden Consortium on Individual Development, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.
Mara van der MeulenLeiden Consortium on Individual Development, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.
Marian J Bakermans-KranenburgLeiden Consortium on Individual Development, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.
Eveline A CroneLeiden Consortium on Individual Development, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle childhood marks an important phase for developing and maintaining social relations. At the same time, this phase is marked by a gap in our knowledge of the genetic and environmental influences on brain responses to social feedback and their relation to behavioral aggression. In a large developmental twin sample (509 7- to 9-year-olds), the heritability and neural underpinnings of behavioral aggression following social evaluation were investigated, using the Social Network Aggression Task (SNAT). Participants viewed pictures of peers that gave positive, neutral, or negative feedback to the participant's profile. Next, participants could blast a loud noise toward the peer as an index of aggression. Genetic modeling revealed that aggression following negative feedback was influenced by both genetics and environmental (shared as well as unique environment). On a neural level (n = 385), the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex gyrus (ACCg) responded to both positive and negative feedback, suggesting they signal for social salience cues. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were specifically activated during negative feedback, whereas positive feedback resulted in increased activation in caudate, supplementary motor cortex (SMA), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Decreased SMA and DLPFC activation during negative feedback was associated with more aggressive behavior after negative feedback. Moreover, genetic modeling showed that 13%-14% of the variance in dorsolateral PFC activity was explained by genetics. Our results suggest that the processing of social feedback is partly explained by genetic factors, whereas shared environmental influences play a role in behavioral aggression following feedback.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionSocial BehaviorSocial PerceptionAggressionCaudate NucleusCerebral CortexChildChild BehaviorFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexPrefrontal Cortexbehavioral geneticsdorsolateral prefrontal cortexpeer feedbacktwin study

Identifiers

PMID29528161
PMCPMC6055731
OpenAlexW2793499754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.