ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2018
An International Approach to Enhancing a National Guideline on Driving and Dementia.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of the Risks of Motor Vehicle Crashes Associated with Psychiatric Disorders.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2023Pooled it
- Driving and Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of the existing guidelines emphasizing on the neurologist's role.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Pooled it
- The value of using the Addenbrookes Cognitive Exam-III and the Rookwood Driving Battery to aid fitness-to-drive decisions with people who have dementia or mild cognitive impairment.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- 'It is empowering and gives people dignity in a very difficult process': A multistage, multimethod qualitative study to understand the views of end users in the cultural adaptation of a dementia and driving decision aid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- State Department of Motor Vehicles Reporting Mandates of Dementia Diagnoses and Dementia Underdiagnosis.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- A qualitative study exploring the experiences and needs of people living with young onset dementia related to driving cessation: 'It's like you get your legs cut off'.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- Predicting On-Road Driving Skills, Fitness to Drive, and Prospective Accident Risk in Older Drivers and Drivers with Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Importance of Non-Cognitive Risk Factors.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
- Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Transportation Equity, Health, and Aging: A Novel Approach to Healthy Longevity with Benefi ts Across the Life Span.NAM perspectives · 2019Article
- The MMSE should not be the sole indicator of fitness to drive in mild Alzheimer's dementia.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this study was to update a national guideline on assessing drivers with dementia, addressing limitations of previous versions which included a lack of developmental rigor and stakeholder involvement.
methodsAn international multidisciplinary team reviewed 104 different recommendations from 12 previous guidelines on assessing drivers with dementia in light of a recent review of the literature. Revised guideline recommendations were drafted by consensus. A preliminary draft was sent to specialist physician and occupational therapy groups for feedback, using an a priori definition of 90% agreement as consensus. RECENT
findingsThe research team drafted 23 guideline recommendations, and responses were received from 145 stakeholders. No recommendation was endorsed by less than 80% of respondents, and 14 (61%) of the recommendations were endorsed by more than 90%.The recommendations are presented in the manuscript. The revised guideline incorporates the perspectives of consensus of an expert group as well as front-line clinicians who regularly assess drivers with dementia. The majority of the recommendations were based on evidence at the level of expert opinion, revealing gaps in the evidence and future directions for research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29527643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.