ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2017
Numerical algorithms for scatter-to-attenuation reconstruction in PET: empirical comparison of convergence, acceleration, and the effect of subsets.
Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resolving inter-crystal scatter in a light-sharing depth-encoding PET detector.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- A review of PET attenuation correction methods for PET-MR.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- Fast Energy Dependent Scatter Correction for List-Mode PET Data.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- PET/MRI attenuation estimation in the lung: A review of past, present, and potential techniques.Medical physics · 2020Review
- Algorithms for joint activity-attenuation estimation from positron emission tomography scatter.EJNMMI physics · 2019Article
- Modification of Green's one-step-late algorithm for attenuated emission data.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2019Article
- Time of flight PET reconstruction using nonuniform update for regional recovery uniformity.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of scattered coincidences for attenuation correction of positron emission tomography (PET) data has recently been proposed. For practical applications, convergence speeds require further improvement, yet there exists a trade-off between convergence speed and the risk of non-convergence. In this respect, a maximum-likelihood gradient-ascent (MLGA) algorithm and a two-branch back-projection (2BP), which was previously proposed, were evaluated.
methodsMLGA was combined with the Armijo step size rule; and accelerated using conjugate gradients, Nesterov's momentum method, and data subsets of different sizes. In 2BP, we varied the subset size, an important determinant of convergence speed and computational burden. We used three sets of simulation data to evaluate the impact of a spatial scale factor. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The Armijo step size allowed 10-fold increased step sizes compared to native MLGA. Conjugate gradients and Nesterov momentum lead to slightly faster, yet non-uniform convergence; improvements were mostly confined to later iterations, possibly due to the non-linearity of the problem. MLGA with data subsets achieved faster, uniform, and predictable convergence, with a speed-up factor equivalent to the number of subsets and no increase in computational burden. By contrast, 2BP computational burden increased linearly with the number of subsets due to repeated evaluation of the objective function, and convergence was limited to the case of many (and therefore small) subsets, which resulted in high computational burden.
conclusionPossibilities of improving 2BP appear limited. While general-purpose acceleration methods appear insufficient for MLGA, results suggest that data subsets are a promising way of improving MLGA performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.