Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527585›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2018

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Dosing Trial of Ranibizumab In Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: The REACT Study.

Justis P Ehlers, Kevin Wang, Rishi P Singh, Amy S Babiuch, Andrew P Schachat, Alex Yuan, Jamie L Reese, Laura Stiegel, Sunil K Srivastava

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justis P EhlersCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Kevin WangOphthalmic Imaging Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Rishi P SinghCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Amy S BabiuchCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Andrew P SchachatCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Alex YuanCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Jamie L ReeseCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Laura StiegelCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Sunil K SrivastavaCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Cleveland Eye Clinic · USCleveland Clinic · USImaging Center · US

Funding

Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography for Ophthalmic SurgeryK23EY022947 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI EHLERS, JUSTIS · 2013 to 2017
$1.0M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY022947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the efficacy of ranibizumab for persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) previously treated with bevacizumab and compare monthly vs treat-and-extend (TAE) dosing.

design12-month, open-label, prospective randomized comparative dosing study.

participants27 participants with persistent foveal-involving DME recently treated with bevacizumab.

methodsAll subjects were to receive three initial monthly 0.3 mg ranibizumab injections before randomization to monthly (n=15) or TAE (n=12) injection protocols over 12 months. Treatment interval was extended by two weeks up to a maximum interval of 12 weeks in the TAE group if central subfield thickness (CST) was ≤ 300 μm

main outcome measuresChange in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CST, adverse events.

resultsPrior to study enrollment, subjects received an average of 8.6 bevacizumab injections. At month 12, mean ETDRS BCVA improved by + 5.3 letters (p<0.05) and mean CST decreased by -99.6 μm (p<0.01) in all patients. At study exit, 18.5 % of subjects gained ≥ 3 lines of vision and 3.7% of subjects lost ≥ 3 lines. Patients treated via the TAE protocol gained +8.4 letters and decreased CST by -120.2 μm whereas those treated by monthly injection gained +2.7 letters and decreased CST by -83.1 μm at month 12.

conclusionsFollowing conversion to ranibizumab in eyes with persistent DME refractory to bevacizumab, significant functional and anatomic improvements were noted. Visual and anatomical outcomes were similar in TAE and monthly treatment protocols.

Identifiers

PMID29527585
PMCPMC5839652
OpenAlexW2757901284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.