Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527569›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Collateral Projections Innervate the Mammillary Bodies and Retrosplenial Cortex: A New Category of Hippocampal Cells.

Lisa Kinnavane, Seralynne D Vann, Andrew J D Nelson, Shane M O'Mara, John P Aggleton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mapping Projectome Heterogeneity of Subiculum Neuron Cell Types.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-regional coordination of activity in the human brain during autobiographical self-referential processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neurochemistry of the mammillary body.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Time to put the mammillothalamic pathway into context.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Deconstructing the Direct Reciprocal Hippocampal-Anterior Thalamic Pathways for Spatial Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa KinnavaneSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-168X
Seralynne D VannSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6709-8773
Andrew J D NelsonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-413X
Shane M O'MaraTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, D2, Ireland.
John P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-1308
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103722/Z14/ZWellcome Trust WT090954AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the hippocampus, it is necessary to understand the subiculum. Unlike other hippocampal subfields, the subiculum projects to almost all distal hippocampal targets, highlighting its critical importance for external networks. The present studies, in male rats and mice, reveal a new category of dorsal subiculum neurons that innervate both the mammillary bodies (MBs) and the retrosplenial cortex (RSP). These bifurcating neurons comprise almost half of the hippocampal cells that project to RSP. The termination of these numerous collateral projections was visualized within the medial mammillary nucleus and the granular RSP (area 29). These collateral projections included subiculum efferents that cross to the contralateral MBs. Within the granular RSP, the collateral projections form a particularly dense plexus in deep Layer II and Layer III. This retrosplenial termination site colocalized with markers for VGluT2 and neurotensin. While efferents from the hippocampal CA fields standardly collateralize, subiculum projections often have only one target site. Consequently, the many collateral projections involving the RSP and the MBs present a relatively unusual pattern for the subiculum, which presumably relates to how both targets have complementary roles in spatial processing. Furthermore, along with the anterior thalamic nuclei, the MBs and RSP are key members of a memory circuit, which is usually described as both starting and finishing in the hippocampus. The present findings reveal how the hippocampus simultaneously engages different parts of this circuit, so forcing an important revision of this network.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnterior Thalamic NucleiGyrus CinguliHippocampusMaleMammillary BodiesMice, Inbred C57BLNeural PathwaysNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesNeuronsRatsSpecies Specificityanterior thalamic nucleicingulate cortexepisodic memoryfornixsubiculum

Identifiers

PMID29527569
PMCPMC5844061
OpenAlexW2791135630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.