Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527537›Full record

ArticleRobotic surgery (Auckland)2018

Robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery: current perspectives.

Marina Roizenblatt, Thomas L Edwards, Peter L Gehlbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Robotic surgery (Auckland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robotising vitreoretinal surgeries.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Robotic Assistance for Intraocular Microsurgery: Challenges and Perspectives.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Creation of an Automated Fluorescence Guided Tumor Ablation System.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Robotics and ophthalmology: Are we there yet?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina RoizenblattDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas L EdwardsDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter L GehlbachDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

OCT-Guided Free-Hand Semi-Automated Microsurgical Tool for Enhanced Retinal SurgeR01EY021540 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEHLBACH, PETER LOUIS, KANG, JIN U · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitreoretinal microsurgery is among the most technically challenging of the minimally invasive surgical techniques. Exceptional precision is required to operate on micron scale targets presented by the retina while also maneuvering in a tightly constrained and fragile workspace. These challenges are compounded by inherent limitations of the unassisted human hand with regard to dexterity, tremor and precision in positioning instruments. The limited human ability to visually resolve targets on the single-digit micron scale is a further limitation. The inherent attributes of robotic approaches therefore, provide logical, strategic and promising solutions to the numerous challenges associated with retinal microsurgery. Robotic retinal surgery is a rapidly emerging technology that has witnessed an exponential growth in capabilities and applications over the last decade. There is now a worldwide movement toward evaluating robotic systems in an expanding number of clinical applications. Coincident with this expanding application is growth in the number of laboratories committed to "robotic medicine". Recent technological advances in conventional retina surgery have also led to tremendous progress in the surgeon's capabilities, enhanced outcomes, a reduction of patient discomfort, limited hospitalization and improved safety. The emergence of robotic technology into this rapidly advancing domain is expected to further enhance important aspects of the retinal surgery experience for the patients, surgeons and society.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgeryprecisionretinarobotic assistancerobotic eye surgeryvitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID29527537
PMCPMC5842029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.