Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527350›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

mCME project V.2.0: randomised controlled trial of a revised SMS-based continuing medical education intervention among HIV clinicians in Vietnam.

Christopher J Gill, Ngoc Bao Le, Nafisa Halim, Cao Thi Hue Chi, Viet Ha Nguyen, Rachael Bonawitz, Pham Vu Hoang, Hoang Long Nguyen, Phan Thi Thu Huong, Anna Larson Williams and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02381743 (The mCME Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02381743 nacompletednot on this map

The mCME Project:Delivering Continuing Medical Education for Community Health Workers Via SMS Text Messages

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2015 to 2015Enrolled638ConditionsMedical KnowledgeArmsGroup 2 intervention daily SMS bullet point, Group 3 intervention daily SMS bullet point
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher J GillDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ngoc Bao LeConsulting Research for Community Development, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nafisa HalimDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cao Thi Hue ChiVietnam Authority for AIDS Control, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Viet Ha NguyenCenter for Population Research Information and Databases (CPRID), General Office for Population and Family Planning, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Rachael BonawitzDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pham Vu HoangCenter for Population Research Information and Databases (CPRID), General Office for Population and Family Planning, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hoang Long NguyenVietnam Authority for AIDS Control, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phan Thi Thu HuongVietnam Authority for AIDS Control, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Anna Larson WilliamsDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ngoc Anh LeHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Lora SabinDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Boston University · USMinistry of Health · VNCenter for Environment and Community Assets Development · VNHanoi Medical University · VNInstitute of Population, Health and Development · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuing medical education (CME) is indispensable, but costs are a barrier. We tested the effectiveness of a novel mHealth intervention (mCME V.2.0) promoting CME among Vietnamese HIV clinicians.

methodsWe enrolled HIV clinicians from three provinces near Hanoi. The 6-month intervention consisted of (1) daily short message service multiple-choice quiz questions, (2) daily linked readings, (3) links to online CME courses and (4) feedback messages describing the performance of the participant relative to the group. Control participants had equal access to the online CME courses. Our primary endpoint was utilisation of the online CME courses; secondary endpoints were self-study behaviour, performance on a standardised medical exam and job satisfaction.

resultsFrom 121 total HIV clinicians in the three provinces, 106 (87.6%) enrolled, and 48/53 intervention (90%) and 47/53 control (89%) participants completed the endline evaluations. Compared with controls, intervention participants were more likely to use the CME courses (risk ratio (RR) 2.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.8, accounting for 83% of course use (P<0.001)). Intervention participants increased self-study behaviours over controls in terms of use of medical textbooks (P<0.01), consulting with colleagues (P<0.01), searching on the internet (P<0.001), using specialist websites (P=0.02), consulting the Vietnam HIV/AIDS treatment guidelines (P=0.02) and searching the scientific literature (P=0.09). Intervention participants outperformed controls on the exam (+23% vs +12% score gains, P=0.05) and had higher job satisfaction.

conclusionThe mCME V.2.0 intervention improved self-study behaviour, medical knowledge and job satisfaction. This approach has potential for expansion in Vietnam and similar settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02381743.

Indexed as

health education and promotionhealth policypublic healthrandomised control trial

Identifiers

PMID29527350
PMCPMC5841494
OpenAlexW2794679588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.