Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527347›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2018

Staged implementation of a two-tiered hospital-based neonatal care package in a resource-limited setting in Eastern Uganda.

Kathy Burgoine, Juliet Ikiror, Sylivia Akol, Margaret Kakai, Sara Talyewoya, Alex Sande, Tom Otim, Francis Okello, Adam Hewitt-Smith, Peter Olupot-Olupot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathy BurgoineNeonatal Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-745X
Juliet IkirorNeonatal Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda.
Sylivia AkolNeonatal Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda.
Margaret KakaiNeonatal Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda.
Sara TalyewoyaNeonatal Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda.
Alex SandePharmacy Department, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda.
Tom OtimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.
Francis OkelloBusitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
Adam Hewitt-SmithBusitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
Peter Olupot-OlupotBusitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal mortality remains a major global challenge. Most neonatal deaths occur in low-income countries, but it is estimated that over two-thirds of these deaths could be prevented if achievable interventions are scaled up. To date, initiatives have focused on community and obstetric interventions, and there has been limited simultaneous drive to improve neonatal care in the health facilities where the sick neonates are being referred. Few data exist on the process of implementing of neonatal care packages and their impact. Evidence-based guidelines for neonatal care in health facilities in low-resource settings and direction on how to achieve these standards of neonatal care are therefore urgently needed. We used the WHO-Recommended Quality of Care Framework to build a strategy for quality improvement of neonatal care in a busy government hospital in Eastern Uganda. Twelve key interventions were designed to improve infrastructure, equipment, protocols and training to provide two levels of neonatal care. We implemented this low-cost, hospital-based neonatal care package over an 18-month period. This data-driven analysis paper illustrates how simple changes in practice, provision of basic equipment and protocols, ongoing training and dedicated neonatal staff can reduce neonatal mortality substantially even without specialist equipment. Neonatal mortality decreased from 48% to 40% (P=0.25) after level 1 care was implemented and dropped further to 21% (P<0.01) with level 2 care. In our experience, a dramatic impact on neonatal mortality can be made through modest and cost-effective interventions. We recommend that stakeholders seeking to improve neonatal care in low-resource settings adopt a similar approach.

Indexed as

Africalow resource settingneonatal careneonatal unit

Identifiers

PMID29527347
PMCPMC5841522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.