ArticleBMJ global health2018
Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO 'Best Buys' for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015.
Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health impact of alcohol regulatory interventions: a systematic review of policies in low- and middle-income countries.Health policy and planning · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Social Marketing as a Behavior Change Agent in Salt Reduction.Global heart · 2025Pooled it
- The relationship between climate change, globalization and non-communicable diseases in Africa: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers and Opportunities for WHO "Best Buys" Non-communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation research on noncommunicable disease prevention and control interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2022Pooled it
- How to dampen the surge of non-communicable diseases in Southeast Asia: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health policy and planning · 2022Pooled it
- Models of care for patients with hypertension and diabetes in humanitarian crises: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2021Pooled it
- Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence.BMJ global health · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Predictors of Self-Care Behaviours Among Patients With Chronic Disease: A Multicountry Survey.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital, Uganda: A mixed method study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Projecting Global Trends and Inequalities in Adult Overweight and Obesity, 2023-2040: Findings From the NCD-RisC Database.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- [Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Article
- What is the Role of Primary Prevention of Obesity in an Age of Effective Pharmaceuticals?Current obesity reports · 2025Review
- Healthcare Cost Coverage and Hypertension and Diabetes Care Step Movement: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study in a Malaysian Semi-Rural Community.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Quick buys for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- Hypertension and its determinants in Abu Dhabi population: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer screening by cotesting method for Vietnamese women 25-55 years old: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Continuous glucose monitoring combined with artificial intelligence: redefining the pathway for prediabetes management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Factors influencing non-communicable disease policy process in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.BMJ public health · 2025Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with low-income and middle-income countries experiencing a disproportionately high burden. Since 2010 WHO has promoted 24 highly cost-effective interventions for NCDs, dubbed 'best buys'. It is unclear whether these interventions have been evaluated in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs).
aimTo systematically review research on interventions aligned to WHO 'best buys' for NCDs in LLMICs.
methodsWe searched 13 major databases and included papers conducted in the 83 World Bank-defined LLMICs, published between 1 January 1990 and 5 February 2015. Two reviewers independently screened papers and assessed risk of bias. We adopted a narrative approach to data synthesis. The primary outcomes were NCD-related mortality and morbidity, and risk factor prevalence.
resultsWe identified 2672 records, of which 36 were included (608 940 participants). No studies on 'best buys' were found in 89% of LLMICs. Nineteen of the 36 studies reported on the effectiveness of tobacco-related 'best buys', presenting good evidence for group interventions in reducing tobacco use but weaker evidence for interventions targeting individuals. There were fewer studies on smoking bans, warning labels and mass media campaigns, and no studies on taxes or marketing restrictions. There was supportive evidence that cervical screening and hepatitis B immunisation prevent cancer in LLMICs. A single randomised controlled trial supported polypharmacy for cardiovascular disease. Fourteen of the 'best buy' interventions did not have any good evidence for effectiveness in LLMICs.
conclusionsWe found studies on only 11 of the 24 interventions aligned with the WHO 'best buys' from LLMIC settings. Most LLMICs have not conducted research on these interventions in their populations. LLMICs should take action to implement and evaluate 'best buys' in their national context, based on national priorities, and starting with interventions with the strongest evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.