Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527334›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2017

Preparedness for delivering non-communicable disease services in primary care: access to medicines for diabetes and hypertension in a district in south India.

Maya Annie Elias, Manoj Kumar Pati, Praveenkumar Aivalli, Bhanuprakash Srinath, Chikkagollahalli Munegowda, Zubin Cyrus Shroff, Maryam Bigdeli, Prashanth N Srinivas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From Numbers to Care: The Increasing Burden of Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus at Primary Health Centers in Rural India - Insights from NFHS-5.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maya Annie EliasHealth equity & evaluation cluster, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Manoj Kumar PatiHealth equity & evaluation cluster, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Praveenkumar AivalliHealth equity & evaluation cluster, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Bhanuprakash SrinathHealth equity & evaluation cluster, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Chikkagollahalli MunegowdaHealth equity & evaluation cluster, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Zubin Cyrus ShroffAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maryam BigdeliDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Prashanth N SrinivasHealth equity & evaluation cluster, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0968-0826
Institute of Public Health Bengaluru · INAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) have become a major public health challenge worldwide; they account for 28 million deaths per year in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Like many other LMICs, India is struggling to organise quality care for a large NCD-affected population especially at the primary healthcare level. The aim of this study was to assess local health system preparedness in a south Indian primary healthcare setting for addressing diabetes and hypertension.

methodsThis paper draws on a mixed-methods research study on access to medicines conducted in Tumkur, Karnataka, India. We used quantitative data from household and health facility surveys, and qualitative data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with health workers and patients. We identified systemic drivers that influence utilisation of services at government primary health centres (PHCs) using thematic analysis of qualitative data and a systems framework on access to medicines to assess supply and demand side factors.

resultsMajority of households depend on private facilities for diabetes and hypertension care because of the lack of laboratory facilities and frequent medicine stockouts at PHCs. Financial and managerial resource allocation for NCDs and prioritisation of care and processes related to NCDs was suboptimal compared to the prominence of this agenda at global and national levels. Primary healthcare has a limited role even in the activities under the national programme that addresses diabetes and hypertension. DISCUSSION: The study finds critical gaps in the preparedness of PHCs and district health systems in organising and managing care for diabetes and hypertension. Due to the lack of continuous care organised through PHCs, patients depend on expensive and often episodic care in the private sector. There is a need to improve managerial and financial resource allocation towards diabetes and hypertension (and other NCDs) at the district level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2015/03/005640; Pre-results.

Indexed as

diabeteshealth services researchhypertension

Identifiers

PMID29527334
PMCPMC5841528
OpenAlexW2781953581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.