Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527232›Full record

ReviewFuture virology2016

Simian adenoviruses as vaccine vectors.

Susan J Morris, Sarah Sebastian, Alexandra J Spencer, Sarah C Gilbert

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Developing the next-generation of adenoviral vector vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at the vaccination site.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan J MorrisJenner Institute, ORCRB, University of Oxford, Off Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Sarah SebastianJenner Institute, ORCRB, University of Oxford, Off Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Alexandra J SpencerJenner Institute, ORCRB, University of Oxford, Off Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Sarah C GilbertJenner Institute, ORCRB, University of Oxford, Off Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Jenner Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication incompetent human adenovirus serotype 5 (HAdV-C5) has been extensively used as a delivery vehicle for gene therapy proteins and infectious disease antigens. These vectors infect replicating and nonreplicating cells, have a broad tissue tropism, elicit high immune responses and are easily purified to high titers. However, the utility of HAdV-C5 vectors as potential vaccines is limited due to pre-existing immunity within the human population that significantly reduces the immunogenicity of HAdV-C5 vaccines. In recent years, adenovirus vaccine development has focused on simian-derived adenoviral vectors, which have the desirable vector characteristics of HAdV-C5 but with negligible seroprevalence in the human population. Here, we discuss recent advances in simian adenovirus vaccine vector development and evaluate current research specifically focusing on clinical trial data.

Indexed as

BAC recombineeringchimpanzee adenovirusesclinical trialssimian adenovirusesvector vaccine

Identifiers

PMID29527232
PMCPMC5842362
OpenAlexW2519763881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.