ArticleScientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading2018
Examining the Etiology of Reading Disability as Conceptualized by the Hybrid Model.
Article in Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relation between reading and externalizing behavior: a correlational meta-analysis.Annals of dyslexia · 2024Pooled it
- Reading intervention and neuroplasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of brain changes associated with reading intervention.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Combining Old and New for Better Understanding and Predicting Dyslexia.New directions for child and adolescent development · 2019Pooled it
- Revisiting the definition of dyslexia.Annals of dyslexia · 2024Article
- Developmental dyslexia susceptibility genes DNAAF4, DCDC2, and NRSN1 are associated with brain function in fluently reading adolescents and young adults.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- A Bayesian Probabilistic Framework for Identification of Individuals with Dyslexia.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2023Article
- Exploring the Machine Learning Paradigm in Determining Risk for Reading Disability.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2023Article
- Insights into Dyslexia Genetics Research from the Last Two Decades.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Developmental dynamics between reading and math in elementary school.Developmental science · 2021Article
- How the Science of Reading Informs 21st-Century Education.Reading research quarterly · 2020Article
- Differential Identification of Females and Males with Reading Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis.Reading and writing · 2018Article
- Early Identification of Children with Dyslexia: Variables Differentially Predict Poor Reading Versus Unexpected Poor Reading.Reading research quarterlyArticle
- Genetics and the Science of Reading.The Reading League journalArticle
- The Prevalence of Dyslexia: A New Approach to Its Estimation.Journal of learning disabilitiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A fairly recent definition of reading disability (RD) is that in the form of a hybrid model. The model views RD as a latent construct that is manifested through various observable unexpected impairments in reading related skills and through inadequate response to intervention. The current report evaluated this new conceptualization of RD from an etiological perspective. The sample consisted of 2737 twin pairs in first through fourth grade (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.