ArticleTechnology and disability2018
An integrative review of information and communication technology based support interventions for carers of home dwelling older people.
Article in Technology and disability, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What's behind the Dashboard? Intervention Mapping of a Mobility Outcomes Monitoring System for Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Communication Technology Use by Caregivers of Adolescents With Mental Health Issues: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Dementia family carers' needs and wants for technological solutions to their work-care reconciliation challenges: semi-structured interviews.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Perceptions of Digital Technology Experiences and Development Among Family Caregivers and Technology Researchers: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Challenges and Recommendations for the Deployment of Information and Communication Technology Solutions for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review.JMIR aging · 2020Article
- Review and Selection of Online Resources for Carers of Frail Adults or Older People in Five European Countries: Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Care organising technologies and the post-phenomenology of care: An ethnographic case study.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020Article
- Perceptions of Information and Communication Technology as Support for Family Members of Persons With Heart Failure: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of wrist-worn actigraphy to measure frailty in homebound older adults.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA growing number of studies of informal carers of older people reveal positive results concerning support via Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Systematic examination of factors that have a potential impact on carer outcomes are needed to inform future research.
objectiveTo explore studies concerning ICT support of adult carers of older people and to identify study characteristics that have a potential impact on carer outcomes.
methodsThis integrative review includes 123 studies published since 2005. Fundamental questions for designing sensitive support interventions; '
resultsIdentified characteristics from the studies responding to the
conclusionResults are discussed according to micro, meso and macro levels of analysis. This extensive review can inform future studies and highlight the evidence in the area for decision makers, practitioners and/or NGOs working with innovative forms of support for carers of older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.