Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29527098›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V2018

Disorders of spermatogenesis: Perspectives for novel genetic diagnostics after 20 years of unchanged routine.

Frank Tüttelmann, Christian Ruckert, Albrecht Röpke

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pharmacogenetics of FSH Action in the Male.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. A Novel Homozygous Mutation inHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  15. Human reproduction open · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank TüttelmannInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Vesaliusweg 12-14, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Christian RuckertInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Vesaliusweg 12-14, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Albrecht RöpkeInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Vesaliusweg 12-14, 48149 Münster, Germany.
University of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility is a common condition estimated to affect 10-15% of couples. The clinical causes are attributed in equal parts to the male and female partners. Diagnosing male infertility mostly relies on semen (and hormone) analysis, which results in classification into the two major phenotypes of oligo- and azoospermia. The clinical routine analyses have not changed over the last 20 years and comprise screening for chromosomal aberrations and Y‑chromosomal azoospermia factor deletions. These tests establish a causal genetic diagnosis in about 4% of unselected men in infertile couples and 20% of azoospermic men. Gene sequencing is currently only performed in very rare cases of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and the

Indexed as

AzoospermiaMale infertilityOligozoospermia

Identifiers

PMID29527098
PMCPMC5838132
OpenAlexW2791358533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.