Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29526881›Full record

Observational studyNeurologia medico-chirurgica2018

Efficacy and Safety of REVIVE SE Thrombectomy Device for Acute Ischemic Stroke: River JAPAN (Reperfuse Ischemic Vessels with Endovascular Recanalization Device in Japan).

Nobuyuki Sakai, Shinzo Ota, Yasushi Matsumoto, Rei Kondo, Tetsu Satow, Michiya Kubo, Tomoyuki Tsumoto, Yukiko Enomoto, Taketo Kataoka, Hirotoshi Imamura and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Forced suction thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke using the SOFIA Plus device.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Nobuyuki SakaiNeurosurgery, Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Shinzo OtaNeurosurgery, Ota Memorial Hospital.
Yasushi MatsumotoNeuroendovascular Therapy, Kohnan Hospital.
Rei KondoNeurosurgery, Yamagata City Hospital Saiseikan.
Tetsu SatowNeurosurgery, Cerebrovascular Medicine and Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Michiya KuboNeurosurgery, Saiseikai Toyama Hospital.
Tomoyuki TsumotoNeuroendovascular Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center.
Yukiko EnomotoNeurosurgery, Gifu University.
Taketo KataokaNeurosurgery, Nakamura Memorial Hospital.
Hirotoshi ImamuraNeurosurgery, Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Kenichi TodoNeurosurgery, Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Mikito HayakawaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Hiroshi YamagamiDivision of Stroke Care Unit, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Kazunori ToyodaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Yasushi ItoNeurosurgery, Niigata University.
Kenji SugiuNeurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Science.
Yuji MatsumaruNeurosurgery, University of Tsukuba.
Shinichi YoshimuraNeurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine.
RIVER JAPAN Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

REVIVE SE (REVIVE) is a closed-ended, self-expanding stent retriever used in the RIVER JAPAN study. We present our early experience with REVIVE for revascularization of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients who have failed or are ineligible for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment. This prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, multicenter registry study followed up patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with REVIVE for 90 days. The primary endpoint was a post-procedure Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score ≥2a. Secondary endpoints were clot migration/embolization; recanalization without symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at 24 h; symptomatic ICH; good neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score decrease ≥10) at day 90; device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) and mortality at day 90. To confirm non-inferiority of REVIVE, results were compared with historical data of the Merci Retriever. About 49 patients were enrolled (median age 73 years; males 46.9%; middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion 83.7%; median NIHSS score 17). A post-procedure TICI score ≥2a was observed in 73.5% (36/49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 58.9-85.1) of patients. No post-procedural clot migration/embolization events occurred. Successful recanalization without symptomatic ICH was observed in 62.5% (30/48, 95% CI 47.4-76.0). The good neurological outcome was achieved in 66.7% (32/48) patients. Symptomatic ICH and device- or procedure-related SAEs were reported in 6.3% and 12.2% of patients, respectively. Two deaths were reported. REVIVE demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety as the Merci Retriever. Results suggest that REVIVE is effective and safe in recanalizing occluded intracranial arteries in AIS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStentsStrokeThrombectomyTreatment Outcomeacute ischemic strokeapproving studyJapanREVIVEstent retriever

Identifiers

PMID29526881
PMCPMC5929914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.