Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29526182›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018

Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Exercise Training in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Rainer Gloeckl, Tessa Schneeberger, Inga Jarosch, Klaus Kenn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06142266 (Assessment of Improvement in Functional Status in Moderate to Severe Stable COPD Patients After Exercise Rehabilitation Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06142266 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Improvement in Functional Status in Moderate to Severe Stable COPD Patients After Exercise Rehabilitation Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsCopdArmsExercise rehabilitation program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Kinesiophobia in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Concept Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rainer GloecklSchön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land, Schönau am Königssee; The Centre for Preventive and Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of; Munich (TUM); Philipps-Universität Marburg, German Center for Lung Research (DZL).
Tessa Schneeberger
Inga Jarosch
Klaus Kenn
Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition that is becoming increasingly prevalent. It affects 13.2% of the population over age 40 in Germany. In 2020, it will be the third most common cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. It markedly impairs the quality of life of those who suffer from it and presents a major economic challenge to the health-care system.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search and on the authors' clinical experience.

resultsPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients with COPD is supported by evidence on the highest level. It is associated with statistically significant (p <0.001) and clinically relevant improvement in physical performance (6-minute walk distance: + 44 m; 95% confidence interval [33; 55]), shortness of breath (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire: +0.79 points [0.56; 1.03]), and the quality of life (Saint George´s Respiratory Questionnaire: -6.9 points [-9.3; -4.5]). The benefits of PR are especially evident after an acute exacerbation of COPD: it significantly lowers the rate of readmission to the hospital (odds ratio 0.22 [0.08; 0.58], p = 0.002) and improves physical performance ability (6-minute walk distance: + 62 m [38; 86] and the quality of life (Saint George´s Respiratory Questionnaire: -7.8 points [-12.1; -3.5]; p <0.001 for both).

conclusionPR is an effective and cost-effective therapeutic intervention that improves physical performance ability, shortness of breath, and the quality of life in patients with COPD, but it has not yet been fully implemented as recommended in the relevant guidelines. There is a need for targeted, problem-oriented referral to a range of PR programs with problem-specific content. The necessary outpatient PR structures still need to be established in Germany.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesExercise TherapyGermanyHumansPatient Education as TopicPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID29526182
PMCPMC5852307
OpenAlexW2791852262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.