ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018
Snail immunohistochemical overexpression correlates to recurrence risk in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results from a longitudinal cohort study.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- LncRNA MEG3 Inhibits the Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition of Bladder Cancer Cells through the Snail/E-cadherin Axis.Current medical science · 2024Article
- Research Progress of Urine Biomarkers in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Proteomic profiling of bladder cancer for precision medicine in the clinical setting: A review for the busy urologist.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Review
- Urinary Markers in Bladder Cancer: An Update.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current WHO/ISUP classification and grading system subdivides urothelial tumours into prognostically distinct categories. Understanding the molecular pathways involved in bladder cancer development can improve patient stratification and management. This study aims to investigate the relationship between Snail, Slug and E-cadherin expressions and clinico-pathological features of non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC). All patients attending the same urological centre from January to May 2002, who were pathologically diagnosed with NMIBC, were enrolled in this longitudinal cohort study. E-cadherin, Snail and Slug protein expressions were assessed by immunohistochemical analysis and compared with follow-up data. The main outcome measures were recurrence and progression rates. The cohort under investigation included 43 patients (38 men and 5 women, mean age 67.7 ± 10.6 years). High-grade (HG) carcinomas were 20/43, with 10 invasive cases (pT1). Low-grade (LG) carcinomas were 23/43, with no invasive cases (pTa). Among the eight HGpTa cases with recurrence, strong Snail expression was detected in six (75%). Out of the 17 LGpTa patients who experienced recurrence, 12 (70.6%) showed strong positivity for Snail. Among the 10 HGpT1 cases, recurrence was observed in 4, of which, 3 (75%) stained intensely for Snail. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly different recurrence rates for patients with strong or weak Snail reactivity (p = 0.027). E-cadherin and Slug expression did not correlate with any of the parameters considered. On multivariate analysis, Snail expression was recognised as an independent prognostic factor for tumour recurrence (p = 0.003). In our study population, Snail immunohistochemical overexpression proved to be related to tumour recurrence in patients affected by NMIBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.