Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29525786›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: Pilot Implementation of a Near-Real-Time Monitoring Program in Italy.

Flavia Mayer, Ursula Kirchmayer, Paola Coletta, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Giovanna Cappai, Mirko Di Martino, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Marina Davoli, Elisabetta Patorno

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New Function for Safety Signal Monitoring in MID-NETClinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Flavia MayerDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Ursula KirchmayerDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy u.kirchmayer@deplazio.it.
Paola ColettaCentre for Oral Anticoagulant Therapy, Santo Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Nera AgabitiDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Valeria BelleudiDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna CappaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Mirko Di MartinoDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Sebastian SchneeweissDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Roma 1 Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta PatornoDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

Novel Approaches to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of Newly Marketed Diabetes Medications in Older Adults Considering Frailty and MultimorbidityK08AG055670 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PATORNO, ELISABETTA · 2018 to 2021
$661k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG055670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-time monitoring is used to the ends of postmarketing observational research on newly marketed drugs. We implemented a pilot near-real-time monitoring program on the test case of oral anticoagulants. Specifically, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation secondary prevention during 2013-2015 in the Lazio Region, Italy. METHODS AND

resultsA cohort study was conducted using a sequential propensity-score-matched new user parallel-cohort design. Sequential analyses were performed using Cox models. Overall, 10 742 patients contributed to the analyses. Compared with vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulant use was associated with a reduction of all-cause mortality (0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.99), cardiovascular mortality (0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.93), myocardial infarction (0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.04), ischemic stroke (0.87; 95% CI 0.52-1.45), hemorrhagic stroke (0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.88), and with a nonsignificant increase of gastrointestinal bleeding (1.26; 95% CI 0.69-2.30).

conclusionsThe present pilot study is a cornerstone to develop real-time monitoring for new drugs in our region.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationBlood CoagulationCause of DeathComparative Effectiveness ResearchDatabases, FactualHemorrhageHumansItalyPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsVitamin Kanticoagulantcomparative effectivenessdrug therapymonitoringpharmacoepidemiologypilotreal‐worldsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID29525786
PMCPMC5907561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.