Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29525780›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Cognitive Function Before and After Left Heart Catheterization.

David A Scott, Lisbeth Evered, Paul Maruff, Andrew MacIsaac, Sarah Maher, Brendan S Silbert

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David A ScottCentre for Anaesthesia and Cognitive Function, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Lisbeth EveredCentre for Anaesthesia and Cognitive Function, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul MaruffFlorey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew MacIsaacDepartment of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah MaherCentre for Anaesthesia and Cognitive Function, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Brendan S SilbertCentre for Anaesthesia and Cognitive Function, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia brendan.silbert@svha.org.au.
St Vincent's Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital procedures have been associated with cognitive change in older patients. This study aimed to document the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in individuals undergoing left heart catheterization (LHC) before the procedure and the incidence of cognitive decline to 3 months afterwards. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a prospective, observational, clinical investigation of elderly participants undergoing elective LHC. Cognition was assessed using a battery of written tests and a computerized cognitive battery before the LHC and then at 3 months afterwards. The computerized tests were also administered at 24 hours (or discharge) and 7 days after LHC. A control group of 51 community participants was recruited to calculate cognitive decline using the Reliable Change Index. Of 437 participants, mild cognitive impairment was identified in 226 (51.7%) before the procedure. Computerized tests detected an incidence of cognitive decline of 10.0% at 24 hours and 7.5% at 7 days. At 3 months, written tests detected an incidence of cognitive decline of 13.1% and computerized tests detected an incidence of 8.5%. Cognitive decline at 3 months using written tests was associated with increasing age, whereas computerized tests showed cognitive decline was associated with baseline amnestic mild cognitive impairment, diabetes mellitus, and prior coronary stenting.

conclusionsMore than half the patients aged >60 years presenting for LHC have mild cognitive impairment. LHC is followed by cognitive decline in 8% to 13% of individuals at 3 months after the procedure. Subtle cognitive decline both before and after LHC is common and may have important clinical implications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL: www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12607000051448.

Indexed as

CognitionAgedCardiac CatheterizationCognitive DysfunctionDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime Factorscatheterizationcognitioncognitive impairmentcoronary angiographyleft heart catheterization

Identifiers

PMID29525780
PMCPMC5907560
OpenAlexW2790769651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.