Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29525772›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.

Larissa Galastri Baraldi, Euridice Martinez Steele, Daniela Silva Canella, Carlos Augusto Monteiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 228 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Examination of the nutritional intake of patients undergoing opioid replacement therapy: A systematic review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Integrative development of a short screening questionnaire of highly processed food consumption (sQ-HPF).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Larissa Galastri BaraldiDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6793-7899
Euridice Martinez SteeleDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Silva CanellaCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto MonteiroDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare ultra-processed food consumption across sociodemographic groups and over time (2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2011-2012) in the USA.

designCross-sectional study.

settingNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012.

participantsAll individuals aged ≥2 years with at least one 24-hour dietary recall were included (n=23 847).

main outcome measuresAverage dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods (expressed as a percentage of the total caloric value of the diet), obtained after classifying all food items according to extent and purpose of industrial food processing using NOVA classification. DATA ANALYSIS: Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between sociodemographic characteristics or NHANES cycles and dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods.

resultsAlmost 60% of calories consumed in the period 2007-2012 came from ultra-processed foods. Consumption of ultra-processed foods decreased with age and income level, was higher for non-Hispanic whites or non-Hispanic blacks than for other race/ethnicity groups and lower for people with college than for lower levels of education, all differences being statistically significant. Overall contribution of ultra-processed foods increased significantly between NHANES cycles (nearly 1% point per cycle), the same being observed among males, adolescents and high school education-level individuals.

conclusionsUltra-processed food consumption in the USA in the period 2007-2012 was overall high, greater among non-Hispanic whites or non-Hispanic blacks, less educated, younger, lower-income strata and increased across time.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFeeding BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFast FoodsFemaleFood AdditivesHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleNutrition SurveysTime FactorsUnited StatesFood Additivesdietnutrition surveysUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29525772
PMCPMC5855172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.