Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2018
Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
121 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of AI-assisted drug repurposing in neurological disorders: a systematic review of validation strategies, challenges and opportunities.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Gut microbiota and ALS: cause, consequence or correlation? - a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Herbal medicines for SOD1Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Canadian best practice recommendations for the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020Guideline
- Home-Based Tele-tDCS in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Ultrahigh-Dose Methylcobalamin in Early-Stage Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2022Trial
- Randomized phase 2 study of perampanel for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- The unfolded protein response in amyotrophic later sclerosis: results of a phase 2 trial.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Clinical staging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: analysis of Edaravone Study 19.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Ferroptosis and aging: Inducing and catalyzing neurodegenerative diseases.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Pridopidine Mediated Sigma-1 Receptor Activation and Therapeutic Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Emerging perspectives in proteostasis: bridging mechanisms and therapeutics for human diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- How to improve statistical power in a trial with SCA2 patients using natural history data.Trials · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Challenges and Future Breakthroughs in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From Precision Medicine to Innovative Trial Design.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Large-scale drug screening in iPSC-derived motor neurons from sporadic ALS patients identifies a potential combinatorial therapy.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mitochondria as a Therapeutic Target in Neurodegeneration: Strategies for Restoring Cellular Homeostasis.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- Cortical excitability stratifies neurochemical profiles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Increase in Ia Afferent Synaptic Excitation of SOD1 G93A Mouse Motoneurons by 2-Week Anodal Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Ameliorate the Cellular Burden of the Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Examining iPSC derived motor neuron variability and genome stability monitoring as a solution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRiluzole is the only drug to prolong survival for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and, at a dose of 100 mg, was associated with a 35% reduction in mortality in a clinical trial. A key question is whether the survival benefit occurs at an early stage of disease, late stage, or is spread throughout the course of the disease. To address this question, we used the King's clinical staging system to do a retrospective analysis of data from the original dose-ranging clinical trial of riluzole.
methodsIn the original dose-ranging trial, patients were enrolled between December, 1992, and November, 1993, in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Canada, the USA, and the UK if they had probable or definite ALS as defined by the El Escorial criteria. The censor date for the riluzole survival data was set as the original study end date of Dec 31, 1994. For this analysis, King's clinical ALS stage was estimated from the electronic case record data of the modified Norris scale, UK Medical Research Council score for muscle strength, El Escorial category, vital capacity, and gastrostomy insertion data. The lowest allocated stage was 2 because the original trial only included patients with probable or definite ALS. We used a χ
findingsWe analysed the case records of all 959 participants from the original dose-ranging trial, 237 assigned to 50 mg/day riluzole, 236 to 100 mg/day, 244 to 200 mg/day, and 242 to daily placebo. Clinical stage at enrolment did not significantly differ between treatment groups (p=0·22). Time in stage 4 was longer for patients receiving 100 mg/day riluzole than for those receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·36-0·83; log-rank p=0·037). Combining treatment groups and stratifying by stage at enrolment showed a similar result (HR 0·638, 95% CI 0·464-0·878; p=0·006), as did analysis with MOAT where the mean number of days spent in stage 4 was numerically higher for patients given riluzole at higher doses compared with patients receiving placebo. Time from stages 2 or 3 to subsequent stages or death did not differ between riluzole treatment groups and placebo (p=0·83 for stage 2 and 0·88 for stage 3).
interpretationWe showed that riluzole prolongs survival in the last clinical stage of ALS; this finding needs to be confirmed in a prospective study, and treatment effects at stage 1 still need to be analysed. The ALS stage at which benefit occurs is important for counselling of patients before starting treatment. Staging should be used in future ALS clinical trials to assess the stage at which survival benefit occurs, and a similar approach could be used for other neurodegenerative diseases.
fundingNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, The European Union Joint Programme on Neurodegeneration, and the King's Summer Undergraduate Studentship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.