Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29525457›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2018

Activation of Piezo1 but Not Na

Martin Loynaz Prieto, Kamyar Firouzi, Butrus T Khuri-Yakub, Merritt Maduke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Sono-Mechanogenetics: Linking Ultrasound Physics With Cellular Mechanobiology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PIEZO channels as multimodal mechanotransducers.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin Loynaz PrietoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kamyar FirouziE. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Butrus T Khuri-YakubE. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Merritt MadukeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: maduke@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Neurostimulation by Ultrasound: Physical, Biophysical and Neural MechanismsR01EB019005 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BACCUS, STEPHEN A, BUTTS-PAULY, KIM · 2014 to 2017
$2.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) can modulate the electrical activity of the excitable tissues, but the mechanisms underlying this effect are not understood at the molecular level or in terms of the physical modality through which US exerts its effects. Here, we report an experimental system that allows for stable patch-clamp recording in the presence of US at 43 MHz, a frequency known to stimulate neural activity. We describe the effects of US on two ion channels proposed to be involved in the response of excitable cells to US: the mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel and the voltage-gated sodium channel Na

Indexed as

Ultrasonic WavesAnimalsCells, CulturedHumansIon ChannelsMembrane PotentialsNAV1.2 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelRatsTransfectionIon ChannelsNAV1.2 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPiezo1 protein, mouseAcoustic streamingElectrophysiologyMechanotransductionMembrane biophysicsMembrane stressPiezo channelSodium channelUltrasound neuromodulationUltrasound neurostimulation

Identifiers

PMID29525457
PMCPMC5914535
OpenAlexW2789348677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.