Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29524874›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018

The national implementation of Contingency Management (CM) in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Attendance at CM sessions and substance use outcomes.

Dominick DePhilippis, Nancy M Petry, Marcel O Bonn-Miller, Sarah B Rosenbach, James R McKay

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The dissemination and implementation of contingency management for substance use disorders: A systematic review.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integrating HIV and Stimulant-Use Disorder Treatment: A Pilot Implementation Effectiveness Trial of Contingency Management in HIV Care.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dominick DePhilippisCenter of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States. Electronic address: dominick.dephilippis@va.gov.
Nancy M PetryCalhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06030, United States.
Marcel O Bonn-MillerPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Sarah B RosenbachSteinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
James R McKayCenter of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
University of Pennsylvania · USNew York University · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Adaptive Treatment Models for the Management of Drug Use DisordersK24DA029062 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKAY, JAMES R. · 2010 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2011, the Department of Veterans Affairs launched an initiative to expand patients' access to contingency management (CM) for the treatment of substance use disorders, particularly stimulant use disorder. This study evaluates the uptake and effectiveness of the VA initiative by presenting data on participation in coaching, fidelity to key components of the CM protocol, and clinical outcomes (CM attendance and substance use).

methodsFifty-five months after the first VA stations began offering CM to patients in June 2011, 94 stations had made CM available to 2060 patients. As those 94 VA stations began delivering CM to Veterans, their staff participated in coaching calls to maintain fidelity to CM procedures. As a part of the CM coaching process, those 94 implementation sites provided data describing the setting and structure of their CM programs as well as their fidelity practices. Additional data on patients' CM attendance and urine test results also were collected from the 94 implementation sites.

resultsThe mean number of coaching calls the 94 programs participated in was 6.5. The majority of sites implemented CM according to recommended standard guidelines and reported high fidelity with most CM practices. On average, patients attended more than half their scheduled CM sessions, and the average percent of samples that tested negative for the target substance was 91.1%.

conclusionThe VA's CM implementation initiative has resulted in widespread uptake of CM and produced attendance and substance use outcomes comparable to those found in controlled clinical trials.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceVeteransAdultBehavior TherapyCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHumansMaleSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsCentral Nervous System StimulantsContingency managementDepartment of Veterans AffairsStimulants

Identifiers

PMID29524874
PMCPMC6435332
OpenAlexW2792582058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.