ArticleNeuroImage2018
MIDAS: Regionally linear multivariate discriminative statistical mapping.
Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relating Cognition to both Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Methods.Brain connectivity · 2023Pooled it
- Neuroanatomical dimensions in major depression linked to cognition, adverse life events, self-harm, metabolomics and genetics.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Neurobiological subtypes of adolescent depression: a multimodal integration of morphometric similarity network and spatial transcriptomics.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Neuroanatomical dimensions in medication-free individuals with major depressive disorder and treatment response to SSRI antidepressant medications or placebo.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Cortical structural changes of morphometric similarity network in early-onset schizophrenia correlate with specific transcriptional expression patterns.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Psychosis brain subtypes validated in first-episode cohorts and related to illness remission: results from the PHENOM consortium.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Article
- Schizophrenia Imaging Signatures and Their Associations With Cognition, Psychopathology, and Genetics in the General Population.The American journal of psychiatry · 2022Article
- Two neuroanatomical subtypes of males with autism spectrum disorder revealed using semi-supervised machine learning.Molecular autism · 2022Article
- Multi-scale semi-supervised clustering of brain images: Deriving disease subtypes.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- Multivariate spatial feature selection in fMRI.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- A heuristic information cluster search approach for precise functional brain mapping.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of schizophrenia revealed using machine learning.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Article
- A Multidimensional Neural Maturation Index Reveals Reproducible Developmental Patterns in Children and Adolescents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical parametric maps formed via voxel-wise mass-univariate tests, such as the general linear model, are commonly used to test hypotheses about regionally specific effects in neuroimaging cross-sectional studies where each subject is represented by a single image. Despite being informative, these techniques remain limited as they ignore multivariate relationships in the data. Most importantly, the commonly employed local Gaussian smoothing, which is important for accounting for registration errors and making the data follow Gaussian distributions, is usually chosen in an ad hoc fashion. Thus, it is often suboptimal for the task of detecting group differences and correlations with non-imaging variables. Information mapping techniques, such as searchlight, which use pattern classifiers to exploit multivariate information and obtain more powerful statistical maps, have become increasingly popular in recent years. However, existing methods may lead to important interpretation errors in practice (i.e., misidentifying a cluster as informative, or failing to detect truly informative voxels), while often being computationally expensive. To address these issues, we introduce a novel efficient multivariate statistical framework for cross-sectional studies, termed MIDAS, seeking highly sensitive and specific voxel-wise brain maps, while leveraging the power of regional discriminant analysis. In MIDAS, locally linear discriminative learning is applied to estimate the pattern that best discriminates between two groups, or predicts a variable of interest. This pattern is equivalent to local filtering by an optimal kernel whose coefficients are the weights of the linear discriminant. By composing information from all neighborhoods that contain a given voxel, MIDAS produces a statistic that collectively reflects the contribution of the voxel to the regional classifiers as well as the discriminative power of the classifiers. Critically, MIDAS efficiently assesses the statistical significance of the derived statistic by analytically approximating its null distribution without the need for computationally expensive permutation tests. The proposed framework was extensively validated using simulated atrophy in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and further tested using data from a task-based functional MRI study as well as a structural MRI study of cognitive performance. The performance of the proposed framework was evaluated against standard voxel-wise general linear models and other information mapping methods. The experimental results showed that MIDAS achieves relatively higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting group differences. Together, our results demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach to efficiently map effects of interest in both structural and functional data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.