Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29524334›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2018

In vitro and in vivo characterization of the bifunctional μ and δ opioid receptor ligand UFP-505.

N Dietis, H Niwa, R Tose, J McDonald, V Ruggieri, M Filaferro, G Vitale, L Micheli, C Ghelardini, S Salvadori and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: ComparativeACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NovelACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Emerging areas of opioid pharmacology.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

N DietisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-3837
H NiwaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
R ToseDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
J McDonaldDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
V RuggieriDepartment of Oncology Haematology and Respiratory Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
M FilaferroDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neuro-Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
G VitaleSection of Pharmacology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
L MicheliDepartment of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
C GhelardiniDepartment of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
S SalvadoriDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Pharmacology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
G CaloDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Pharmacology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5436-959X
R GuerriniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
D J RowbothamDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
D G LambertDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Division of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-8090
University of Leicester · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTargeting more than one opioid receptor type simultaneously may have analgesic advantages in reducing side-effects. We have evaluated the mixed μ opioid receptor agonist/ δ opioid receptor antagonist UFP-505 in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We measured receptor density and function in single μ, δ and μ /δ receptor double expression systems. GTPγ KEY

resultsUFP-505 bound to μ receptors with full agonist activity and to δ receptors as a low efficacy partial agonist At μ, but not δ receptors, UFP-505 binding recruited arrestin. Unlike morphine, UFP-505 treatment internalized μ receptors and there was some evidence for internalization of δ receptors. Similar data were obtained in a μ /δ receptor double expression system. In rats, acute UFP-505 or morphine, injected intrathecally, was antinociceptive. In tissues harvested from these experiments, μ and δ receptor density was decreased after UFP-505 but not morphine treatment, in agreement with in vitro data. Both morphine and UFP-505 induced significant tolerance. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In this study, UFP-505 behaved as a full agonist at μ receptors with variable activity at δ receptors. This bifunctional compound was antinociceptive in rats after intrathecal administration. In this model, dual targeting provided no advantages in terms of tolerance liability. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Areas of Opioid Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.14/issuetoc.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsOligopeptidesAnimalsCHO CellsCricetulusInjections, SpinalLigandsMalePainRats, WistarReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesicsH-Dmt-Tic-Gly-NH-BzlLigandsOligopeptidesReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID29524334
PMCPMC6016625
OpenAlexW2791863357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.