Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29524131›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2018

Neuroepigenetic Editing.

Peter J Hamilton, Carissa J Lim, Eric J Nestler, Elizabeth A Heller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Derepression of transposable elements in the mouse prefrontal cortex disrupts social behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. In vivo locus-specific editing of the neuroepigenome.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  10. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Opioid Addiction.Biological psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Recent advances in neuroepigenetic editing.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  14. Epigenetics and addiction.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The past and presence of gene targeting: from chemicals and DNA via proteins to RNA.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Epigenetic Priming in Drug Addiction.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter J HamiltonThe Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, USA.
Carissa J LimDepartment of Pharmacology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eric J NestlerThe Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, USA.
Elizabeth A HellerDepartment of Pharmacology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. eheller@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

REPRESSIVE HISTONE AND DNA METHYLATION IN RODENT DEPRESSION MODELSP50MH096890 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2012 to 2021
$20.2M
Using neuroeconomics to disentangle the transcriptional mechanisms underlying resilience versus susceptibility to stressR01MH051399 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1994 to 2023
$10.2M
Small molecule modulators of ΔFosB FunctionR01DA040621 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI NESTLER, ERIC J., ROBISON, ALFRED J · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
MOLECULAR STUDIES OF COCAINE ACTION IN BRAINR37DA007359 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1996 to 2020
$6.9M
Molecular Studies of Cocaine Action in BrainR01DA007359 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1991 to 2025
$5.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007359NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040621NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA007359NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH096890NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the mammalian nervous system have revealed widespread epigenetic regulation underlying gene expression intrinsic to basic neurobiological function as well as neurological disease. Over the past decade, a critical role has emerged for the neural regulation of chromatin-modifying enzymes during both development and adulthood, and in response to external stimuli. These biochemical data are complemented by numerous next generation sequencing (NGS) studies that quantify the extent of chromatin and DNA modifications in neurons. Neuroepigenetic editing tools can be applied to distinguish between the mere presence and functional relevance of such modifications to neural transcription and animal behavior. This review discusses current advances in neuroepigenetic editing, highlighting methodological considerations pertinent to neuroscience, such as delivery methods and the spatiotemporal specificity of editing. Although neuroepigenetic editing is a nascent field, the studies presented in this review demonstrate the enormous potential of this approach for basic neurobiological research and therapeutic application.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsChromatinDNAGene EditingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMental DisordersNervous System DiseasesNeuronsChromatinDNAChromatinEpigenetic editingNeurosciencePsychiatric disease

Identifiers

PMID29524131
PMCPMC6047758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.