ArticleIrish journal of medical science2019
Frequency of Behçet's disease among a group of visually impaired adults.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBehçet's disease (BD) is one of the reasons of acquired visual impairment among young adults. Ocular involvement is a significant cause of disability in BD. The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of BD among a group of adults who has visual impairment.
methodsAnkara Metropolitan Municipality Education and Technology Center is one of the official institutions which records and follows the demographic data of visually impaired people in Turkey. In November 2014, there were 675 visually impaired people recorded at this center. Medical history was taken from 294 adults by phone in November and December of 2014. Participants were asked if the visual impairment had been either acquired or congenital. If the patients had BD or suspicious BD, they were recalled for detailed investigation which would be carried out by an internist, a rheumatologist and an ophthalmologist.
resultsTwo hundred thirteen of 294 (72.4%) visually impaired adults were male. One hundred nine of 294 (37.1%) had acquired visual impairment. Six (5.5%) of those 109 patients had BD. Overall prevalence of BD among study group was 2.04%.The median age of people with BD was 35 years. The median age at BD diagnosis was 16.5 years and the median duration from diagnosis to visual loss was 2.5 years.
conclusionBD is still one of the causes of acquired visual impairment in Turkey. In this study, BD prevalence among a visually impaired adult group was 2.04%. BD accounted for 5.5% among adults who had acquired visual impairment. In a study of 1965, BD prevalence among people with acquired blindness was 12%. However, this study was conducted at pre-immunosuppressive period. Our prevalence is obviously lower than those studies. Extended population-based studies are needed for population estimations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.