Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29524041›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018

Robot-Assisted Fracture Surgery: Surgical Requirements and System Design.

Ioannis Georgilas, Giulio Dagnino, Payam Tarassoli, Roger Atkins, Sanja Dogramadzi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ioannis GeorgilasBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS161QY, UK. i.georgilas@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-8102
Giulio DagninoBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS161QY, UK.
Payam TarassoliUniversity Hospitals Bristol, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS28HW, UK.
Roger AtkinsUniversity Hospitals Bristol, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS28HW, UK.
Sanja DogramadziBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS161QY, UK.

Funding

Department of Health II-SB-0712-20002Invention for Innovation Programme II-SB-0712-20002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of medical devices is a complex and crucial process to ensure patient safety. It has been shown that improperly designed devices lead to errors and associated accidents and costs. A key element for a successful design is incorporating the views of the primary and secondary stakeholders early in the development process. They provide insights into current practice and point out specific issues with the current processes and equipment in use. This work presents how information from a user-study conducted in the early stages of the RAFS (Robot Assisted Fracture Surgery) project informed the subsequent development and testing of the system. The user needs were captured using qualitative methods and converted to operational, functional, and non-functional requirements based on the methods derived from product design and development. This work presents how the requirements inform a new workflow for intra-articular joint fracture reduction using a robotic system. It is also shown how the various elements of the system are developed to explicitly address one or more of the requirements identified, and how intermediate verification tests are conducted to ensure conformity. Finally, a validation test in the form of a cadaveric trial confirms the ability of the designed system to satisfy the aims set by the original research question and the needs of the users.

Indexed as

WorkflowAdultFemaleFractures, BoneHumansJointsMaleMiddle AgedRobotic Surgical ProceduresComputer-assisted surgeryMedical roboticsPercutaneous fracture surgerySystem design and development

Identifiers

PMID29524041
PMCPMC6153987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.