ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2018
The SbcC and SbcD homologs of the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC7120 (Alr3988 and All4463) contribute independently to DNA repair.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic analysis ofVirus evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ubiquitous SbcCD exonuclease complex has been shown to perform an important role in DNA repair across prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, they have remained uncharacterized in the ancient and stress-tolerant cyanobacteria. In the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC7120, SbcC and SbcD homologs, defined on the basis of the presence of corresponding functional domains, are annotated as hypothetical proteins, namely Alr3988 and All4463 respectively. Unlike the presence of sbcC and sbcD genes in a bicistronic operon in most organisms, these genes were distantly placed on the chromosome in Anabaena, and found to be negatively regulated by LexA. Both the genes were found to be essential in Anabaena as the individual deletion mutants were non-viable. On the other hand, the proteins could be individually overexpressed in Anabaena with no effect on normal cell physiology. However, they contributed positively to enhance the tolerance to different DNA damage-inducing stresses, such as mitomycin C and UV- and γ-radiation. This indicated that the two proteins, at least when overexpressed, could function independently and mitigate the damage caused due to the formation of DNA adducts and single- and double-strand breaks in Anabaena. This is the first report on possible independent in vivo functioning of SbcC and SbcD homologs in any bacteria, and the first effort to functionally characterize the proteins in any cyanobacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.