Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29524007›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2018

Insights into the karyotype evolution and speciation of the beetle Euchroma gigantea (Coleoptera: Buprestidae).

Crislaine Xavier, Rógean Vinícius Santos Soares, Igor Costa Amorim, Diogo Cavalcanti Cabral-de-Mello, Rita de Cássia de Moura

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid chromosomal evolution in the bush-cricketComparative cytogenetics · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Crislaine XavierInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Genética de Insetos, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Rua Arnóbio Marques 310, Santo Amaro, ZIP: 50.100-130, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Rógean Vinícius Santos SoaresInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Genética de Insetos, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Rua Arnóbio Marques 310, Santo Amaro, ZIP: 50.100-130, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Igor Costa AmorimInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Genética de Insetos, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Rua Arnóbio Marques 310, Santo Amaro, ZIP: 50.100-130, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Diogo Cavalcanti Cabral-de-MelloInstituto de Biociências, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia de MouraInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Genética de Insetos, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Rua Arnóbio Marques 310, Santo Amaro, ZIP: 50.100-130, Recife, PE, Brazil. ritamoura.upe@gmail.com.
Universidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305298/2014-3Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco 0777-2.02/15Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/11763-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Euchroma Dejean, 1833 (Buprestidae: Coleoptera) is a monotypic genus comprising the species Euchroma gigantea, with populations presenting a degree of karyotypic variation/polymorphism rarely found within a single taxonomic (specific) unit, as well as drastically incompatible meiotic configurations in populations from extremes of the species range. To better understand the complex karyotypic evolution of E. gigantea, the karyotypes of specimens from five populations in Brazil were investigated using molecular cytogenetics and phylogenetic approaches. Herein, we used FISH with histone genes as well as sequencing of the COI to determine differential distribution of markers and relationships among populations. The analyses revealed new karyotypes, with variability for chromosome number and morphology of multiple sex chromosome mechanisms, occurrence of B chromosome variants (punctiform and large ones), and high dispersion of histone genes in different karyotypes. These data indicate that chromosomal polymorphism in E. gigantea is greater than previously reported, and that the species can be a valuable model for cytogenetic studies. The COI phylogenetic and haplotype analyses highlighted the formation of three groups with chromosomally polymorphic individuals. Finally, we compared the different karyotypes and proposed a model for the chromosomal evolution of this species. The species E. gigantea includes at least three cytogenetically polymorphic lineages. Moreover, in each of these lineages, different chromosomal rearrangements have been fixed. Dispersion of repetitive sequences may have favored the high frequency of these rearrangements, which could be related to both adaptation of the species to different habitats and the speciation process.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularKaryotypeAnimalsChromosomes, InsectColeopteraChromosomal evolutionChromosomal rearrangementHistone dispersionMolecular cytogeneticsMultiple sex chromosome mechanism

Identifiers

PMID29524007
OpenAlexW2791634493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.