Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523955›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2018

The role of synovial fluid analysis in the detection of periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marcello De Fine, Gianluca Giavaresi, Milena Fini, Andrea Illuminati, Silvio Terrando, Giovanni Pignatti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04858217 (Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04858217 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2022 to 2026Enrolled270ConditionsProsthetic Joint Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcello De FineIRCCS, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1\10, 40100, Bologna, Italy. marcello.define@gmail.com.
Gianluca GiavaresiIRCCS, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1\10, 40100, Bologna, Italy.
Milena FiniIRCCS, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1\10, 40100, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea IlluminatiIRCCS, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1\10, 40100, Bologna, Italy.
Silvio TerrandoIRCCS, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1\10, 40100, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni PignattiIRCCS, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1\10, 40100, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study tried to ascertain (1) the accuracy of synovial fluid white blood cell count and polymorphonucleate percentage in the diagnosis of periprosthetic hip and knee infections, (2) which test yielded superior test performance, and (3) the influence on diagnostic accuracy of study characteristics such as patient number, study design, study level, anatomic site, and threshold value.

methodsA systematic search was conducted including papers assessing more effective cutoffs for synovial fluid tests, having comparative design, evaluating an exclusive cohort of hip or knee prostheses, including a clear definition of infected cases, and reporting sufficient data for the calculation of true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative.

resultsA total of 375 articles were collected and, given the inclusion criteria, ten manuscripts were included. These studies assessed 1155 hip prostheses (276 infected cases) and 1235 knee prostheses (401 infected cases). The specificity of synovial fluid white blood cell count was significantly increased by using the threshold value ≥ 3000 cell/μL (p = 0.006); the sensitivity of polymorphonucleate percentage was significantly higher in detecting knee infections (p = 0.034). DISCUSSION: Both tests had a high specificity and sensitivity in detecting periprosthetic joint infections, and no clear superiority of one over the other existed. Furthermore, cutoff and anatomic site significantly influenced synovial fluid white blood cell count and polymorphonucleate percentage, respectively.

conclusionSynovial fluid analysis is adequate in differentiating patients with periprosthetic hip and knee infections. Our data confirms international guidelines suggesting the use of 3000 cell/μL as cutoff threshold for synovial fluid white blood cell count. Since an anatomic site effect has been demonstrated, the goal of future studies will be to identify different cutoffs for hip and knee prostheses.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousBiomarkersHip JointHip ProsthesisHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisLeukocyte CountMaleProsthesis-Related InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersInfected hip prosthesisInfected knee prosthesisPeriprosthetic joint infectionsSynovial fluid analysisSynovial white blood cell count

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.