Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523908›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2018

A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination in Colorectal Surgery.

Harry T Papaconstantinou, Rocco Ricciardi, David A Margolin, Roberto Bergamaschi, Robert C Moesinger, Warren E Lichliter, Elisa H Birnbaum

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03816995 (A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination and Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03816995 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Wound Retractor Combining Continuous Irrigation and Barrier Protection Reduces Incisional Contamination and Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorScott SteeleRan2019 to 2023Enrolled702ConditionsColorectal SurgeryArmsCleanCision Wound Retraction and Protection System, Alexis O Wound Protector
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Harry T PapaconstantinouDepartment of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Healthcare, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX, USA. Harry.Papaconstantinou@bswhealth.org.
Rocco RicciardiMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David A MargolinDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Queensland, Ochsner Clinical School, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Roberto BergamaschiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, State University at Stony Brook, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Robert C MoesingerNorthern Utah Surgeons, Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah, 4401 Harrison Blvd, Ste 1635, Ogden, UT, USA.
Warren E LichliterBaylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Avenue, 1 Roberts, Dallas, TX, USA.
Elisa H BirnbaumDepartment of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Baylor Scott & White Health · USBaylor University Medical Center · USIntermountain Healthcare · USLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USOchsner Medical Center · USStony Brook University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) remains a persistent and morbid problem in colorectal surgery. Key to its pathogenesis is the degree of intraoperative bacterial contamination at the surgical site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel wound retractor at reducing bacterial contamination.

methodsA prospective multicenter pilot study utilizing a novel wound retractor combining continuous irrigation and barrier protection was conducted in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections. Culture swabs were collected from the incision edge prior to device placement and from the exposed and protected incision edge prior to device removal. The primary and secondary endpoints were the rate of enteric and overall bacterial contamination on the exposed incision edge as compared to the protected incision edge, respectively. The safety endpoint was the absence of serious device-related adverse events.

resultsA total of 86 patients were eligible for analysis. The novel wound retractor was associated with a 66% reduction in overall bacterial contamination at the protected incision edge compared to the exposed incision edge (11.9 vs. 34.5%, P < 0.001), and 71% reduction in enteric bacterial contamination (9.5% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001). The incisional SSI rate was 2.3% in the primary analysis and 1.2% in those that completed the protocol. There were no adverse events attributed to device use.

conclusionsA novel wound retractor combining continuous irrigation and barrier protection was associated with a significant reduction in bacterial contamination. Improved methods to counteract wound contamination represent a promising strategy for SSI prevention (NCT 02413879).

Indexed as

AgedBacteriaColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRectumSurgical InstrumentsSurgical WoundSurgical Wound InfectionTherapeutic Irrigation

Identifiers

PMID29523908
OpenAlexW2791492724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.