Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29523907›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Shorter treatment times reduce the impact of intra-fractional motion : A real-time 4DUS study comparing VMAT vs. step-and-shoot IMRT for prostate cancer.

Hendrik Ballhausen, Minglun Li, Ute Ganswindt, Claus Belka

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Duration-dependent margins for prostate radiotherapy-a practical motion mitigation strategy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Novel Method for Improving VMAT Plan Quality and Deliverability.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hendrik BallhausenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Hendrik.Ballhausen@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-1926
Minglun LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Ute GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of shorter treatment times on intra-fractional motion of the prostate during external beam radiotherapy.

methods53 h of intra-fractional motion of the prostate were recorded in real-time by 4D ultrasound (4DUS) during 720 fractions in 28 patients, 14 of which whom treated with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 14 of whom were treated with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT).

resultsThe average VMAT fraction was recorded for 2 min 43 s and was substantially shorter than the average step-and-shoot IMRT fraction at 6 min 13 s. Average radial displacement of the prostate per fraction was substantially and significantly reduced from 1.31 ± 1.28 mm (n = 357 step-and-shoot IMRT fractions) to 0.96 ± 1.04 mm (n = 363 VMAT fractions), p = 0.00004. Radial, vertical, and longitudinal root-mean-square (r. m. s.) error per fraction was reduced from 1.55 to 1.12 mm (-28%, p < 0.0001), from 1.16 to 0.77 mm (-34%, p < 0.0001), and from 0.79 to 0.56 mm (-29%, p = 0.0002), respectively. Lateral intra-fractional motion was generally small and did not differ significantly. The prostate remained during 95% of fraction time within 4.55 mm of the isocenter in case of step-and-shoot IMRT and within 2.45 mm in case of VMAT. The variance of displacements increased linearly with time, and the rate was the same for both step-and-shoot IMRT and VMAT patients.

conclusionsThe position of the prostate changed less during shorter fractions, limiting fraction-average and end-of-fraction variance. This substantially and significantly reduced the impact of intra-fractional motion during shorter VMAT fractions as compared to longer step-and-shoot IMRT fractions.

Indexed as

Organ MotionPatient PositioningAdenocarcinomaAgedDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTime FactorsOrgan motionProstate cancerRadiotherapy, intensity-modulatedUltrasound imagingVolumetric-modulated arc therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.