ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018
Re-assessment of multiple testing strategies for more efficient genome-wide association studies.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Codon Usage Bias Variation and Evolutionary Signatures of Epstein-Barr Virus in Distinct Epithelial Cancers.Viruses · 2026Article
- Article
- Construction of a multiple-class classifier based on mRNAs and lncRNA FAM66A and PSORS1C3 for predicting distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Polygenic Risk Score Contribution to Psychosis Prediction in a Target Population of Persons at Clinical High Risk.The American journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- Improving predictive models for Alzheimer's disease using GWAS data by incorporating misclassified samples modeling.PloS one · 2020Article
- Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Light of Modern Environmental Research: A Tautological Approach.International journal of environmental research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although enormous costs have been dedicated to discovering relevant disease-related genetic variants, especially in genome-wide association studies (GWASs), only a small fraction of estimated heritability can be explained by these results. This is the so-called missing heritability problem. The conventional use of overly conservative multiple testing strategies based on controlling the familywise error rate (FWER), in particular with a genome-wide significance threshold of P <5 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.